Nobody could accuse you of being in anyone's camp - I just hope you don't go there!
You have been very active on this forum in exposing numerous absurdities in this case, by producing facts and drawing conclusions - many of them new to me - like VT's "ordinary" bicycle - and you leave us in no doubt that YOU too think they ARE absurdities.
I wouldn't dignify my arguments as "theories" - any alternative scenario would indeed be absurd. You sourself have emphasised that VT had nothing to gain by pleading guilty. Even if he himself was delusional, a lawyer like William Clegg would never have let his client plead guilty UNLESS there was a very serious hidden agenda behind it.
If you "don't go with" what you call "my theory", then you have a lot more more explaining to do. And explaining is not the least of your talents.
leonora... I don't know WHY certain things happened in this case... All I do is find what facts I can.... and cross reference the inconsistencies in the case and statements made by various individuals... using links.... transcripts ...quotes.... images and video's ..
I don't know why they thought Dr Vincent Tabak would fit the bill... because they have never fully explained what in Flat 1 made them think an assault had taken place... A flat that is virtually pristeen...
They contradict themselves many many times.... And are happy to take the word of one person without any evidence to back this up...
The flat was a mess when Greg Returned home... The dishes were in the sink according to her mum.... (So Greg hadn't done the dishes before they arrived)
Who starts doing the dishes when you believe that there has been an abduction????
The parents were more concerned with checking outside and neighbours as to Joanna Yeates whereabouts...
I'm sure it's the last thing on anyones mind... Yet the kitchen is VOID of ANYTHING...
They removed the carpets... Why?? Where's the hoover ??? where's the washing machine ?? why has the flat got NO personality?? It should have the occupants own style imprinted all over it... But to me it looks like they have had the cleaners in...
In all honesty I cannot say why they concentrated on that block of flats... There were many other avenues that would be more suitable eg: Friends/acquaintences/ colleagues..
But they have zoomed into that flat and the rest of the building... without anything shown at court to prove a murder had taken place there.. Rather it shows that it's a clean and tidy place.... That is so wrong on all levels!!! (IMO)..
We can summise that the Police accessed Dr Vincent Tabak's flat before his arrest on 20th January 2010.. but we can't prove it... It's a possibility seeing as they had the keys to the flat and Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja Morson were away from it...
Talking of that.... What Police Investigation makes it Impossible for the neighbours to live in their own home ??
That is WRONG... Also.... They were happy for the man with the sock to wander about the drive... what were they actually doing in those basement flats for all that time?
As you see I have questions I cannot answer... But if there was some great conspiracy going on and identities changing I wouldn't imagine (personally).. that they would have gone through with a full blown trial... After all they had the "Guilty To Manslaughter" plea at The Old Bailey....
If it was a case as you have suggested that someone took Dr Vincent Tabak's place on the video link.... Why did they just not have them pleading "Guilty to Murder" in the first place .... Then the whole thing could be quietly hushed up...
Probably then...no one would have even questioned the case whatsoever!!