Author Topic: The Sobbing Girl.....  (Read 1316 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline [...]

The Sobbing Girl.....
« on: August 21, 2017, 10:50:50 AM »
I wanted to copy one of my posts to start this thread.... I believe that there is plenty more we can try and understand about The Sobbing Girl... In relation to The Murder of Joanna Yeates ....

And I hope the moderators will allow for this new thread


The Sobbing Girl.... I believe she is IMPORTANT....!!!

Quote
Local horse rider Emma Brewer said yesterday: “It is a bit weird if someone was driving up and down this lane because there is no obvious explanation. It seems suspicious to me. Some people do the school run and would come up and down the lane once, but not on a Saturday, and never three or four times.
So it's Emma Brewer who called the Police I believe.... 
Quote
“I suppose the killer might have panicked on the Friday night, dumped the body and then come back the next day. By then it had snowed very heavily.
why would she know that the killer dumped the body on Friday Night????  why wasn't it the early hours of Saturday morning Mrs Brewer...???

She couldn't possibily know what lairs of snow... what lairs of debris where upon Joanna Yeates body to say whether or not Joanna yeates had lain on Longwood lane from the "Friday Night"!!! That is impossible..... (IMO)...

Again Emma Brewer ...
Quote
“The snow was there for days. And there was another snowfall on the Monday.”

So snow covering a body, could have happened on the Monday 20th December 2010 as I have said earlier in this post....

A Cyclist quotes...
Quote
“And we’re quite high up here. It’s windy and the snow does tend to drift.

So drifting snow... unsure of date of deposition,... Returning vehicles... How does that go with Dr Vincent Tabak ????

Quote
Somebody out there, does know what happened to Joanna, somebody out there is holding that vital piece of information we need to help provide Joanna's family with the answers they need and they want.

So who are they appealing too??? Has Somebody out there contacted the Police with information??? They are  appealing for that person to get back in touch (IMO)... someone out there knows something.... Because he is not directing that statement to the killer... And normally the Police would direct statements to a killer (IMO)...  But this is directed at a seperate individual (IMO)...

The next quote is from the parents of Joanna Yeates ....

Quote
In a heartfelt statement, the couple from Ampfield, Hants, said someone, somewhere knew what had happened to their daughter and warned that if they did not come forward others might suffer the same fate.

Indicating again... that the Police had information given to them and where appealing for them to come forward ....(IMO)...

The parents appeal is a day before we hear of the sobbing girl story is being leaked.... Now, I believe if The Sobbing Girl existed,....... then the information she gave was 'Nothing" to do with Dr Vincent Tabak, because that phone call would have been played in court and even if she didn't appear in court a written statement to add to the 20 written statements... would have been read out at trial.... So I believe The Sobbing Girl was either a complete 'Untruth"... Or she did ring up but told the police different information than what everyone thought she said and didn't implicate Dr Vincent Tabak.....

We have The Police and The Parents.... both appealing directly to someone... someone that The Police kNow has this information.... and the only possible conclusion i can draw from that ...Is..... that this person had already been in contact wth the Police.....

Maybe The Sobbing Girl rang much earlier.... And that is why they could say that there was a Sobbing Girl ringing.... Because maybe it wasn't an UNTRUTH after all.... she rang before the Police Conference on the 12th January 2011 with bits of information... and was crying on the phone at the same time, not giving the Police everything that they needed ......


The Sobbing Girl is Maybe the person who needs to be located... (IMO)....

The sobbing Girl was maybe present at the time....

The Sobbing girl may have know that Joanna Yeates was killed on Friday 17th December 2010....

The Sobbing Girl may have know that  Joanna Yeates was on Longwood Lane .....

The Sobbing Girl may have known that the killer had tried to move the body.....

The Sobbing girl may have known the killer tried to put the body over the wall....

The Sobbing Girl may have been under pressure to help move this body....

The Sobbing Girl may have been at Flat 1 on Friday the 17th December 2010.... The Sobbing Girl knew 'EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED"...


Lets look at the reports of the time again.... How could DCI Phil Jones know this information, before trial???

Quote
Det Chief Inspector Phil Jones, who is leading the murder hunt, has said it is possible the killer may have tried to lift her over the quarry wall, but failed in his attempt and instead left her on the narrow roadside verge.


Because... The Sobbing Girl told him... (IMO)....

How could DCI Phil Jones be so definiate about many aspect of this case before court.... And before Dr Vincent Tabak had signed his statement on 22nd September 2011... And only having those version of events told in court for the first time ... How could he be so certain that she was at home ?????  How when he appeals on 28th December he is NOT SURE WHEN JOANNA YEATES WAS LEFT ON LONGWOOD LANE... But suddenly he now knows it was 'Friday The 17th December 2010!!

So lets look at the 4x4...

Quote
DCI Jones said: 'We have had a number of reports of vehicles in Longwood Lane during the late Friday evening and early hours of Saturday morning, including a possibly light-coloured 4x4 vehicle.
'This 4x4 and the other vehicles may be completely unconnected but I urge anyone in that car or any other driver in the vicinity that night to come forward.'

This report is on the 3rd January 2011...  They know they are looking for a light coloured 4x4... (IMO)... If there are many many vehicles on Longwood lane between Friday 17th December 2010 and Saturday Morning... why pick up on the 4x4... Dr Vincent Tabak didn't have a 4x4 and in he says at court  cars passed ... So if he has stopped on Longwood lane, then his car would also have been seen......  And the Police are NOT appealing for a MEGANE!!!!!

Quote
Defence Counsel: There were many marks on the body. How did that happen?
Tabak: I at first left her by the roadside and two or 3 cars went past and I was in a state of
complete panic. I’m sorry for doing that. I put her parents though hell. I’m so sorry for
that. I can’t believe I did that.
Wheres the witness's  and the witness appeal for Dr Vincent Tabak's 'MEGANE"!!!

Also interesting I hadn't really picked up on was..... 
Quote
I at first left her by the roadside
Again supporting what I was saying about her body being moved.... (IMO).... Because he doesn't continue with trying to do anything with her......


Does that information about the 4x4 come directly from The Sobbing Girl"????

Is that why when they come to question Dr Vincent Tabak, the questions they ask him at the Police station that he constantly makes a 'NO COMMENT reply to....  end up being virtually what he says in court... These questions mirror what Dr Vincent Tabak says in his statement....

(IMO)... That is only possible if the Police already have certain information.... And was the information given to the Police well before the 19th January 2011, by 'The Sobbing Girl ring and telling them some Information she knew....

DCI Phil Jones had NO Forensics in Flat 1 linking Dr Vincent Tabak to the Scene.... yet they spent over a week processing that Flat.... They came out of Flat 1 with huge amounts of Forensic material ..... But none of it was ever associated with Dr Vincent Tabak....

Lets look back at what Dr Vincent Tabak says in court.... those odd details that are pointless (IMO)....

Quote
Defence Counsel: After you put the body in the boot of your car, what did you do next?
Tabak: I went back to Joanna’s flat and switched off the TV and the oven; I took away the
sock and the pizza.

Why would Dr Vincent Tabak need to mention that he switched the oven and TV off ????? How would anyone know that Joanna Yeates had been in the flat long enough to have even turned the oven on......

Why does Clegg need to give this piece of information....
Quote
He took off his coat.
 He hung it on her coat rack.

Because Dr Vincent Tabak doesn't say anything about a coat rack......

Quote
Defence Counsel: Did you take off your coat?
Tabak: Yes.
Defence Counsel: What room did you go into?
Tabak: Kitchen- both of us.

I did ask if that Black Coat in the Forensic womans arms had been left in Flat 1... maybe it was !!!! But obviously not Dr Vincent Tabak's as there's CCTV footage on the 19th January 2011 of him wearing his coat....

If the coat wasn't left behind.... was it a prop used by Police ??? How else would anyone know that a coat had been hung upon a coat rack?????  Did The Sobbing Girl divulge that piece of information.... Did the Sobbing Girl know about the TV and Oven being switched off... because I could see you maybe worry about a house fire... But leaving the TV playing to itself wouldn't make any difference ....(IMO)... And as I keep saying why would Dr Vincent Tabak feel the need to move a body... when leaving Joanna Yeates in her Flat would have been the easiest option for him.... (IMO)......

Is that why DCI Phil Jones talks about "The Killers" as in plural... because The Sobbing Girl had divulged that Information????

So.... what did The Sobbing Girl know about the Murder???? because as sure as eggs is eggs... she DID NOT RING UP ABOUT DR VINCENT TABAK...... (IMO)..... !!!!

And maybe now we need to look at this case and the information about this case as 'A Party" had already told the Police vital Information and that information was what they were working with..... So back to the basic question.... Who was The sobbing Girl?????


Maybe it's time for us to appeal to this "SOBBING GIRL" and ask for her to come forward and tell us what she knows....... (IMO)...

Because The sobbing Girl is a witness!!! (IMO)....

I will add this link which was part of this original post.....

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8060.msg420700#msg420700


http://www.criminal-lawyer.org.uk/39-CLN-JAN-2012.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8noQpXm0HQU&t=617s

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jo-yeates-murder-cops-probe-103679

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/8265779/Joanna-Yeates-parents-make-appeal-for-information.html

Offline [...]

Re: The Sobbing Girl.....
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2017, 10:51:17 AM »
This I believe is the thing that has been staring everybody in the face for so many years.... Everyone on all the forums discounted The Sobbing Girl and never came back to her....

She is The Elephant in The Room ...(IMO)... She is the one who knows 'Something" She is the "THING" we have all been Missing.....

The Police really didn't need to let the Public know about this "Sobbing Girl"....  I believe thats why the appeal happened on the 18th January 2011.... To keep telling the Sobbing Girl they need her vital information.... And to push her further they release in the press that a "Sobbing Girl" had rung the Police.....(IMO)....

Because I believe that.... It is The Sobbing Girl who is The True witness in The Murder of Joanna Yeates ..... (IMO)....

Offline [...]

Re: The Sobbing Girl.....
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2017, 02:06:37 PM »
Quote
In a heartfelt statement, the couple from Ampfield, Hants, said someone, somewhere knew what had happened to their daughter and warned that if they did not come forward others might suffer the same fate.

Again Looking at this statement made by the parents, they are aiming it at an individual..... (IMO)...  An imploring them to come forward... Because if the person doesn't come forward... more people may be killed ....(IMO)...

Quote
Mrs Yeates, 58, said: “Something apparently insignificant could trigger the killer to kill again. Please help us to identify the killer.”

They are asking for this person to identify the killer .....(IMO)...


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/8265779/Joanna-Yeates-parents-make-appeal-for-information.html

Offline [...]

Re: The Sobbing Girl.....
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2017, 10:10:41 AM »
I am bringing this news article here.... I cannot think of any good reason why DCI Phil Jones said what he did to the media after the trial.... I will quote:..

Quote
DCI Jones said Tabak was under police suspicion within 10 days of Joanna’s body being found on Christmas morning.

What happened to make DCI Phil Jones suspicious of Dr Vincent Tabak ??? No only that, but within 10 days of Joanna Yeates body being found....

That is one hell of an admission for him to make when there is NO evidence linking Dr Vincent Tabak to anything by the 4th January 2011

DCI Phil Jones is on record stating that it was the DNA that lead to Dr Vincent Tabak being arrested and the DNA wasn't concluded until around the 20th January 2011.... This he state on the "Judge Rinder ~Program about Joanna Yeates ....

In the :Judge Rinder Program" about the "Murder of "Joanna Yeates" DCI PHIL JONES Says: At 31:25 mins:

Quote
It was around the 20th January, that erm... we positively identified there were components in the mixed DNA.. of Vincent Tabak

So... why was Dr Vincent Tabak under suspicion within 10 days of Joanna Yeates body being found ??

First we have to remember The Bay Window... That the Forensic team worked tireless upon The window on the 24th December 2010....

Again I have to ask is that Joanna Yeates Bay window???
Because if DCI Phil Jones is saying within 10 days of her being found... did they find Joanna Yeates before the 25th December 2010... for the Bay Window to be examined????

But if DCI says within 10 days of Christmas Morning , then it still leaves the question of the Bay Window Examination wide Open... (IMO)...

So what has happened in the 10 days from Joanna Yeates body Officially being discovered ????

At this juncture we need to remember that Dr Vincent Tabak is away for the Christmas period....  We also have to remember that The head of The Complex Crime Unit was approached about Dr Vincent Tabak in late December... Ann Reddrop says this in her statement to the press... So we can literally discount the whole of January, that Dr Vincent Tabak was under suspicion.... So that leaves us with 6 days....

Here is the transcript of what Ann Reddrop says to The TV camera's after The Trial...

Quote
Vincent Tabak was a cunning, dishonest and manipulative man who knew exactly what he was (deali) doing when he killed Joanna Yeates... Today he has been convicted by a jury of her murder last year, despite claiming he meant her know harm.. he was cunning and dishonest towards his girlfriend, with whom he had maintained a normal relationship.. Even going as far as to text her shortly after jo was dead to say he was bored..

He manipulated the Police by virtue of his Indepth research on the internet.. to keep one step ahead of the Investigation, before his arrest, looking up extradition and medical details of decomposition.. he made very selective admissions surrounding the circumstances of Jo's death which sought to cast herin an Unfavourable light... And he kept this up even when he gave Evidence to the Jury...

Tabak thought his cleverness and deceit would prevent him from being convicted of a brutal murder............. He was wrong!

Jo went missing on Friday 17th December last year after meeting with friends for a drink.. For several days the Police mounted a "Missing Person Inquiry", but with the discovery of her body on Christmas Morning, this became a "Murder Investigation...

Late in December the Police ask for assistance and guidance from The Crown Prosecution Service.. That assistance has come from "The South West Case Work Unit" based here in Bristol... I reviewed the Evidence and Advised that Vincet Tabak should be charged with this murder and began preparing this case for trial... In May this year Tabak admitted Jo's Manslaughter....but that was only part of it..

The Crowns Case is... and always has been that it was a deliberate action on his part.. And "That|is why we refused to accept his plea for Manslaughter"... and he faced trial for "Murder"o over the past 4 weeks....

Jo's family have been here in Bristol, during the trial and have listened to much of the evidence... Our thoughts are with them and with her partner Greg today as Tabak begin's a life sentence for "Murdering" Jo...

We have to remember that DC Karen Thomas flew out to Holland to Interview Dr Vincent Tabak about his statement regarding CJ's Car..... On the 31st December 2010....

I'm sorry if you don't agree, But... There has to be more to that Interview than feeling the need for a trip to Holland to gain a basic statement from Dr Vincent Tabak.... Not forgetting Tanja Morson, who also had spoken about the car...

So is DCI Phil Jones openly admitting that Dr Vincent Tabak was a "SUSPECT" when they took a trip to Holland to Interview him for 6 hours...??? which I will repeat.. Is the length of time Dutch Law allows for a "SUSPECT" to be Interviewed.... Which at that point you either release or charge said "SUSPECT"...

Again we have to come to the conclusion...  Dr Vincent Tabak was Not Cautioned at this Interview...
DC Karen Thomas will have us believe that it was "This Interview" that prompted her suspicions.... And not the fact that they already suspected Dr Vincent Tabak.....

Well DC Karen Thomas... I simply don't believe you !!!! Was DCI Joe Goff in tow with you when you went to Holland ??

Anyone with an ounce of sense knows that the Police would not fly over to Holland, to Interview Dr vincent Tabak with regards CJ's car moving.... It's nonsense... They could wait for him to return from Holland and take Dr Vincent Tabak's statement then.... He returned on the 2nd January 2011...
Dr Vincent Tabak's statement would make NO DIFFERENCE to whether they charged CJ or NOT!!!
CJ moving his car doesn't prove anything.....

So we must conclude (IMO)... That Dr Vincent Tabak was A Suspect before he went to Holland.... And The Police Interview that took place there was done Illegally....(IMO)...

So what do we have ???

We know DC Karen Thomas called Dr Vincent Tabak on Christmas Eve... But this is before she is discovered...
Did the Police Enter Dr Vincent Tabak's Property before he was charged ???? Did the Police believe that they found something or saw something in Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat????

Did Dr Vincent Tabak leave his laptop behind and the Police found The Porn they have talked about..... What was it that made Dr Vincent Tabak a "SUSPECT before he was in Holland ????? If that was the case , that would be an illegal search.... But I'm not sure that they did this.... It's very possible... They had free rain in that building to do whatever they wanted... no-one was there to stop them...

Another possibility is that they did indeed search Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat and The Trainers that DCI Phil Jones says that they found under the sink, were in Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat.....

Quote
He added: “There were a pair of trainers which we found in Mr Jefferies’ house which were hidden underneath a kitchen unit, behind a kick board. Those trainers had a blood spot on them, that was initially analysed… eventually a DNA profile was found and Mr Jefferies could be eliminated.”


Is DCI Phil Jones admitting to illegally searching Dr Vincent Tabak's flat whilst he was away for The Christmas period???? It is not beyond the realms of possibility... as we can clearly see The Forensic Officers working on the outside of the Bay Window On the 24th December 2010...

The trainers were never brought to court as evidence !!

If it is NOT The Trainers and an illegal search we are left with the option of "The Sobbing Girl"... The girl who brings to a head the arrest of Dr Vincent Tabak....

The Police pretend it was the Holland Interview... But something more serious had to prompt them to Interview him Holland other than the position of a car changing.... (IMO)...

There needs to be some kind of Information about Dr Vincent Tabak, that prompted the Police to fly to Holland ....(IMO)...

So when did The Sobbing Girl actually ring the Police ???? It has to be extremely early in The Investigation....  It has to be within a day or so.... (IMO)...

She has to be The Witness... But what did she say????


I believe she pointed the finger at someone within that building.... It has to be that ...(IMO)... There is no other conceivable reason that the Police concentrate all there efforts on that building and nothing else... They hanker down on that building and never shift from it.... Not even bothering to test males that Joanna Yeates had been in contact with ....

So... did The Sobbing Girl ring because she was there ??? Did she ring because she knew something about someone in The Building or someone connected to that building.... Was her call just bits of Information, But she mentions the building????

The Sobbing Girl I believe is of Importance... I believe that the Police just used her later on in the Investigation... I believe her existence was know to the Police for a long time.... And They carefully orchestrated the "Yeates appeal 2 days before Dr Vincent Tabak's arrest... And then used The Sobbing Girl to bolster the arrest in the minds of the public....

They needed to arrest Their 'Prime Suspect" before the review.... They needed to make sure that they could hold him without anyone causing a fuss... And a public was already baying for blood at this time.... And the idea that 'A Girl " had called The Police AFTER (so they say).. The Yeates appeal.. only secured in peoples mind that there must be some evidence on Dr Vincent Tabak for them to arrest him....

DCI Phil Jones is basically discounting the DNA evidence (IMO).... That was there for the CSI fans... Everyone likes a good bit of DNA...  But it wasn't the DNA that was the reason that Dr Vincent Tabak was a "SUSPECT"... It can't have been....

He has to be a "SUSPECT" before they fly out to Holland ....(IMO)... And for them to be testing The Bay Window even before Joanna Yeates was discovered on Longwood lane.. The Police had to have been given Information, either about the building or Dr Vincent Tabak directly....

I am staying with it was someone in that building..... That is why I believe they jumped on CJ as soon as he called them on the 29th December 2010, with his enhanced statement....

They must have had theories abound as to how Joanna Yeates made it home yet, was removed from her flat without being dragged... And no forced entry.... So the obvious conclusion they came up with is that The Landlord had keys... But they know he is too frail to manage this on his own so must have had assistance.... 

Stage left... The Placid Dutchman.... CJ speak positively about him , they get on well... The Police jump to conclusions....

I believe The Sobbing Girl was a viable witness... But what did she see... what did she hear ???

She heard  something that made her call The Police in the first place... And i do not believe that it is after The Yeates make their appeal on The 18th January 2011... I believe she called them within days of Joanna Yeates disappearance...

Maybe she called after DS Mark Saunders appeal and the original appeal by The Yeates family.... because the Police wouldn't be lying if they said it was after The Yeates Appeal.... They just didn't tell us which appeal that she rang after ....(IMO)...

So we are talking around the 22nd December 2010....  And the Polices actions support this .... They have an Incident Room parked outside 44, Canygne Road by this time ...  (IMO)...

Maybe we need to look at the Polices actions in context of The Sobbing Girl calling much sooner and work out from there , what Information the Police give to the public and what visual aids The Police use at various times to let The Killer Know that they are watching them .....

I will say again that The Sobbing Girl did not directly identify Dr Vincent Tabak.... she can't of done, because if this was the case then her statement would have been used at trial to bury Dr Vincent Tabak...  And by the time of Dr Vincent Tabak's trial... The Sobbing Girl is a distant memory in The minds of the general public....

We are now told of salacious details and Internet searches , that takes our concentration away from the real facts about this case... Because everyones ready to hang The Dutchman, whether he did it or not... People just want vengeance and not Justice..... (IMO).....

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/280447/Shame-Vincent-Tabak-cannot-hang-for-Jo-Yeates-murder-say-parents

http://hackinginquiry.org/leveson-inquiry/avon-and-somerset-police-chief-denies-mirror-claims-over-police-briefings/

Offline [...]

Re: The Sobbing Girl.....
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2017, 11:24:44 AM »
Here's a thought.....

Is it possible the friend that Joanna yeates rang at 8:30pm on Friday the 17th December 2010 is The Sobbing Girl?????

The Police contact her almost Immediately after Joanna Yeates is Missing...

I only raise this as a possibility ... because before anyone else is aware that Joanna Yeates coat is "Missing"... she is telling the media on the 22nd December 2010, That Joanna Yeates coat is still in The Flat.... When she possibly couldn't have known this !!

Did she in fact go to the Flat??? Is this why The Police are Positive that Joanna Yeates reached home on the 17th December and that was The day that she was killed....

Did she stop off on her way home to chat with Joanna Yeates ???  We have to look at everyone in this case in a different way i believe.....

And The said Friend of Joanna Yeates did do a to camera Interview which lasts over 6 minutes about her friend on the 12th January 2011 ...I believe ....

Quote
''You may not have seen or heard anything but think back - has a friend or family member been acting strangely or suspiciously?

She is the first to make the statement about someone acting suspiciously, before The Yeates statement on the 18th January 2011...

Does she know The Sobbing Girl??? Why would Joanna Yeates friend be interviewed for all to see if it wasn't for any other reason Than to let the killer know she was aware of something???

Was she one of the people that CJ had seen at The Gate ????

Was she at 44, Canygne Road on Friday 17th December 2010 ??? because she knows far too much (IMO)... She says things before The The Official release of Information from The Police themselves .....

Did Joanna Yeates friend look through The eye view on the door to notice The Coat in The Hallway ???

Edit.... Just one more thing about a friend of Joanna Yeates...  There was "One" person who Joanna Yeates knew who had their DNA taken.... Now could this be the friend that she called at 8:30pm on Friday 17th December 2010??

The only reason I say this is because by the 24th December 2010 when The Forensic's are taking Place at Canygne Road... Joanna Yeates Front Door has Forensic Power upon it....

Now if they needed to eliminate said friend... They would need a sample of there DNA, if there face or hands had been pressed upon the door....(IMO)....

http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/656385638




[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline [...]

Re: The Sobbing Girl.....
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2017, 01:25:22 PM »
I think I know who the sobbing girl is.... And it has nothing to do with Dr Vincent Tabak....

The Sobbing Girl report appeared after The Yeates made there appeal... Now, there is no way that it was anything to do with Dr Vincent Tabak... It cannot be.... Up until this point there was nothing to suggest that Dr Vincent Tabak was guilty of anything.....

So the Sobbing Girl is real.... But it is NOT Dr Vincent Tabak she points the finger at.... That is why it isn't played in court....


Offline [...]

Re: The Sobbing Girl.....
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2018, 05:59:33 PM »
Ok... I keep thinking about this... And Again I have a different angle....

It was because of this picture I have attached.... This Picture has bugged me for ages...
Well not so much the people in the image, but that "SIGN"... It's sent me mad... But now i think I have sussed it.....

Back to Sobbing Girl.... I think that is aimed at someone.... I have always believed the Police know who killed Joanna Yeates... And the imagery tells us various things....  So does the reporting....

"Sobbing Girl".. I believe means that "Someone cries like a girl"...." (I'm not trying to be PC here.. I'm making a point..)

And that where i come back to that annoying picture.... It's a message to someone...

SORCY.... I have checked everything and tried to find what that abbreviation means to "The Police".... It has sent me up the wall...

But it means nothing to the Police.......  It's an anagram....  And it's talking to the Killer I believe...

SORCY = So Cry......

I believe they are telling someone something... Don't know who they are talking too , as I don't know who they Interviewed...  But I believe that's what it means...(imo)...

Every so often when I have looked at those letters.. I have made the typo SOCRY... And it never dawned on me till now....

So as I say... I don't believe that there was a "Sobbing Girl"... But I believe that someone knows what that message means  about the "Sobbing Girl" and the letters "SORCY"!!!

[attachment deleted by admin]