Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.

[ferryman]

So again, why were lawyers for sky news at the inquest ?

Precaution, I would think.

The coroner might sound a dissenting note about press intervention and advise that reporters should show sensitivity in asking questions.

But nothing more ...

[Mr Gray]

So again, why were lawyers for sky news at the inquest ?

to offer legal advice?

[Alice Purjorick]

Not only that but that the police investigation had been concluded.

These "sceptics" believe what they want to believe, fantasists.

As Sam Goldwyn might have said "include me out".
I said:
Not, you understand, that I am saying anything other than there is enough of a variance to present a quite different picture.


My argument was purely with the failure of some posters to read, comprehend and be able to impart information accurately in their own mother tongue.

[Alfred R Jones]

As Sam Goldwyn might have said "include me out".
I said:
Not, you understand, that I am saying anything other than there is enough of a variance to present a quite different picture.


My argument was purely with the failure of some posters to read, comprehend and be able to impart information accurately in their own mother tongue.

rubbish.  The only variance came from "video documentary maker" Sonia Poulton.  Hmm.... &%+((£

[Alice Purjorick]

the coroner said no one would be facing criminal charges...stop trying to pretend she said anything different

God you are in a tizz. The coroner said no one she was calling as witness would be facing criminal charges. Which is not the same as no one. And before you go off on one read my original post properly and try to understands what I did say difficult as it may be for you.

[Mr Gray]

As Sam Goldwyn might have said "include me out".
I said:
Not, you understand, that I am saying anything other than there is enough of a variance to present a quite different picture.


My argument was purely with the failure of some posters to read, comprehend and be able to impart information accurately in their own mother tongue.

what you are saying is that you can put your own spin on it to try to pretend it means something else..

[Mr Gray]

the coroner also said...
The police have completed their enquiries and all witness statements have been received.....

[Montclair]

God you are in a tizz. The coroner said no one she was calling as witness would be facing criminal charges. Which is not the same as no one. And before you go off on one read my original post properly and try to understands what I did say difficult as it may be for you.

I know three people who attended the hearing and they all said that the coroner ended her sentence with the phrase, more or less, " but that can change on the day". If the MSM decided to lie by omission and keep that bit of information out, that is their problem and they obviously have an agenda.

[ferryman]

I know three people who attended the hearing and they all said that the coroner ended her sentence with the phrase, more or less, " but that can change on the day". If the MSM decided to lie by omission and keep that bit of information out, that is their problem and they obviously have an agenda.

Lies are being told, right enough ...

[faithlilly]

What I don't understand is if the rumours are true and this tweeter is behind the dossier why she is not willing to be named ? Is she not proud of her work protecting the McCanns 'and the twins' from the threatening disbelieving hordes ?

[Lyall]

What I don't understand is if the rumours are true and this tweeter is behind the dossier why she is not willing to be named ? Is she not proud of her work protecting the McCanns 'and the twins' from the threatening disbelieving hordes ?

You know why Faith, because not everyone on our 'side' is as rational as we are.

People (not us) are behaving incredibly stupidly over this 'dossier'.

[Alfred R Jones]

What I don't understand is if the rumours are true and this tweeter is behind the dossier why she is not willing to be named ? Is she not proud of her work protecting the McCanns 'and the twins' from the threatening disbelieving hordes ?

Maybe the same reason why you're not willing to be named? 

Maybe she or he doesn't relish the prospect of being slagged off mercilessly on the internet, having their children and family targeted, contacted, smeared, his or her place of work contacted by "sceptics" in an attempt to get him or her the sack, or (very most awful prospect of all) having Miss Pointy Poulton turning up on his or her doorstep and jabbing her pointy nails in his or her face?

[Miss Taken Identity]

Maybe the same reason why you're not willing to be named? 

Maybe she or he doesn't relish the prospect of being slagged off mercilessly on the internet, having their children and family targeted, contacted, smeared, his or her place of work contacted by "sceptics" in an attempt to get him or her the sack, or (very most awful prospect of all) having Miss Pointy Poulton turning up on his or her doorstep and jabbing her pointy nails in his or her face?

Or be driven to suicide even?  Yes that would be terrible even much, much worse that Brenda I am sure all abductee enthusiasts would concur.

Well there you have it, it is ok for Brenda to suffer but not the snidey,two faced coward who ran to the MEDIA. Karma dear Friends KARMA.

Compassion is amiss with all that is associated with Team Mcs imo.

[Alfred R Jones]

Brenda who tweeted that she hoped the McCanns suffer forever and who abused them and their supporters verbally over thousands of tweets = "sceptic" heroine and soldier of justice

Person who drew the police & media's attention to the appalling behaviour on the McCann twitter hashtag, most of it tweeted by people hiding behind anonymous IDs = "snidey, two-faced coward".

Such is the topsy-turvy world of the McCann "sceptic"

[Miss Taken Identity]

Brenda who tweeted that she hoped the McCanns suffer forever and who abused them and their supporters verbally over thousands of tweets = "sceptic" heroine and soldier of justice

Person who drew the police & media's attention to the appalling behaviour on the McCann twitter hashtag, most of it tweeted by people hiding behind anonymous IDs = "snidey, two-faced coward".

Such is the topsy-turvy world of the McCann "sceptic"

Oh you are claiming the Moral high ground I see..

 Brenda never killed anyone- she did not deserve to be singled out.  People who live in glass houses should not throw stones. Kate has a nasty streak we have witnessed it, you hold a torch to her, good for you. Watch you don't burn your fingers now!

Your claim 'sceptics' are all evil people who bash the McCanns. People who question, challenge, have every right to do so- what gave you the right to call non fiction readers of abduction 'sceptics'.


ps not every one hates the McCanns- they just feel disgusted at their behavior and their excuses!