The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[kizzy]

Some people think the police have evidence some people think the police have nothing.  Neither set of people knows which is right though they keep on pretending they do.  How about not repeating the same old thing over and over again and just wait for further real developments?  Or do you just like arguing  for the sake of it?

O come of it ........its a post on a forum.

Where does the argument for the sake of it come in.... Who am I arguing with?

As for wait and see....... it's another 3-year+ wait then..


That's if wolt can get anything on CB while he is under 24/7 surveillance.

It is so obvious wolt has no evidence for CB being the abductor of Maddie.

[Venturi Swirl]

O come of it ........its a post on a forum.

Where does the argument for the sake of it come in.... Who am I arguing with?

As for wait and see....... it's another 3-year+ wait then..


That's if wolt can get anything on CB while he is under 24/7 surveillance.

It is so obvious wolt has no evidence for CB being the abductor of Maddie.

OK, you're right Wolt has no evidence.  There you go.  The end.

[G-Unit]

O come of it ........its a post on a forum.

Where does the argument for the sake of it come in.... Who am I arguing with?

As for wait and see....... it's another 3-year+ wait then..


That's if wolt can get anything on CB while he is under 24/7 surveillance.

It is so obvious wolt has no evidence for CB being the abductor of Maddie.

If it could be proved that CB abducted MM there's absolutely no excuse for failing to charge him with that crime immediately. No suggestion has ever been made that such evidence exists. Much as the Germans want to charge CB with murdering MM, my opinion is that they can't prove that either.

[Venturi Swirl]

If it could be proved that CB abducted MM there's absolutely no excuse for failing to charge him with that crime immediately. No suggestion has ever been made that such evidence exists. Much as the Germans want to charge CB with murdering MM, my opinion is that they can't prove that either.

Of course they can't prove it, beyond reasonable doubt anyway but does that mean they have no evidence at all against him which is Kizzy's belief?  Will you acknowledge this post and give a straight answer or ignore it?
Hmm....

[Wonderfulspam]

OK, you're right Wolt has no evidence.  There you go.  The end.

It's alright, because Gonc doesn't have any evidence either.

[Mr Gray]

If it could be proved that CB abducted MM there's absolutely no excuse for failing to charge him with that crime immediately. No suggestion has ever been made that such evidence exists. Much as the Germans want to charge CB with murdering MM, my opinion is that they can't prove that either.

I see that as very simplistic and wrong.
Wolters has said he wants to charge with the best possible evidence...he's in no rush. He may well feel he has a chance of finding the body
..why rush ...

[Wonderfulspam]

The latest lame excuse for why Brueckner hasn't been charged.

[Wonderfulspam]

How many more years are we thinking Wolters needs? Another 6 Maybe? 7? Let's be fair & give him 12. If Brueckner still hasn't been charged in 12 years time, then maybe you'll all have to start accepting that which is already plainly obvious to the rest of us.

[jassi]

How many more years are we thinking Wolters needs? Another 6 Maybe? 7? Let's be fair & give him 12. If Brueckner still hasn't been charged in 12 years time, then maybe you'll all have to start accepting that which is already plainly obvious to the rest of us.

I'm not sure I've got another 12. That would make me nearly 90 

[Venturi Swirl]

So the troll is going to give it 12 years.  Does that mean hes’s going to put a cork in it until then?   

[Wonderfulspam]

So the troll is going to give it 12 years.  Does that mean hes’s going to put a cork in it until then?   

No I'm not. I was just about to say how I'm absolutely disgusted that Mr Gray referred to Madeleine as "The Body".  I'm pretty sure the McCanns wouldn't approve of their precious daughter being described in such a manner. Appalling.

[Eleanor]

I'm not sure I've got another 12. That would make me nearly 90 

Stick in there.  There's nothing wrong with 90.  And you are hardly likely to get Dementia with so much to figure out.

And you aren't actually an unkind person anyway.

[faithlilly]

This is why information offered to the police after an individual has been arrested should never be used to build a case against another individual.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/26/appeal-court-overturns-manchester-rape-conviction-of-man-who-spent-17-years-in-jail-andrew-malkinson

[Venturi Swirl]

This is why information offered to the police after an individual has been arrested should never be used to build a case against another individual.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/26/appeal-court-overturns-manchester-rape-conviction-of-man-who-spent-17-years-in-jail-andrew-malkinson

I believe the person you’re referring to had already completed their sentence before coming forward.  Are you suggesting  that no cases have ever been successfully solved thanks to information given by criminal accomplices? 
You may as well say that victims and witnesses  picking a suspect out of a line up should never be used either.

[Eleanor]

This is why information offered to the police after an individual has been arrested should never be used to build a case against another individual.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/26/appeal-court-overturns-manchester-rape-conviction-of-man-who-spent-17-years-in-jail-andrew-malkinson

Could you put this Comment on "Wandering Off Topic" and then I can say my piece.