Decided to have a quick look at one of those "Destroyed" Sunshine blogs. Steph, Kenny, Danni. B and Sharon: In less than 10mins they discussed 'Folklore' - Chinese whispers, those arms and legs that get added to information. In that same 10mins here is their Folklore:
They are stating (Steph) that Jodi did not have her hair up that night, it was not contained in any red fastener. That the notion of this fastener came from a reporter who all but put the idea into Luke's head. To note here, they talked of witness statements, Kenny in particular shuffling about with sheets of papers, trying to infer, give the impression he had them, the actual statements?!
Ok you four - I am unsure as to why you somehow take the notion that the pathologist lied in his report and produced a hair bobble that did not exist?! That clear lack of brain cells where between the four of you combined, are clearly still lacking enough sandwiches for the picnic basket.
To be clear, and I will call you imbeciles for there is no other word to describe you - The hair fastener is actually part of evidence. It physically exists. Found embedded. tangled deep into Jodi's hair. The evidence led around this, whether your lack of any actual intelligence accepts this or not, was: - That LM first and foremost mentioned that to the police, not the other way around, not a reporter. LM. The very reason it was significant is the police knew from that pathology report how hidden that this was from view. Not only that but you are actually in total contradiction to Lean herself. Who in one of her own lives went into extensive detail, to try and explain why Luke may have seen this prior to Jodi's body being moved. The implication by herself that it was due to movement that put it out of sight for the pathologist. That just because AW and SK did not mention it in any of their statements does not mean they did not see it, it could simply mean they just did not see reason to mention it!!
To note here, the reason they are stating that Jodi did not have her hair up, no bobble in it, is due to the original reconstruction on the 7th July 2003 by the police where they had Jodi's hair down. They also mention, that the reconstruction was done on the basis of what Jodi's family had told police she was wearing that evening. Really? So they (Kenny, Steph n co) dismiss all of what Lean says bar the reporter?! guff, yet seem to know what Jodi's family said? However, to catch a killer. And to note here of what AB said about the girls hair, that it may have been contained at the back of her neck. Loosely held with something? - To the police, to what LM had told them about the hair bobble, and to what they were not going to put out there, reason why, for those with some common sense to use?!
That hair fastener was not easily visible, it was worn loosely around the bottom half of Jodi's hair, not up in thee typical type of ponytail. Two people had mentioned this to the point of the reconstruction, the pathologist and LM. This was something the police wanted to know, if only the killer would have known and it proved right. For AW, SK the police at the scene, did not mention this red band but LM had. That is why it was a vital piece of evidence. The very reason we heard the guff already from Lean, repeated over the years. To try and give out every possible reason as to why LM could have seen this. CM herself in previous forum discussions stated clearly that "Luke had a good! torch with him, very bright!" This is the reason she gave as to why he had seen it that night!
And on this alone - it is more than safe to say, that every piece of nonsense these attentions seekers come out with can be put right out with the trash. And of the Oven debacle, and of any non correction by Lean whom feeds and entices this guff by her mere presence, who was in the live chat section of this blog. Perhaps she was giving her puppets some marks for being top of the dunce class? - Where it can not be any clearer, that these four people are a classic example of the level of intelligence required to spout those half truths, misinformation, downright lies and their own version of the LM V HMA , "FOLKLORE". - Top notch stuff for the gullible.
I had to stop short at the dog stuff! The lies, the misinformation and those arms and legs - the rewriting of this case is nothing short of madness. LM went to the left, for the dog did not react before coming to the actual V. Ok, so not because LM stated his dog had actually reacted some distance past the V to the left then? That it went straight to the wall at the V, and he just knew to go left, not straight ahead but left, as the dog had not reacted prior to this. Dam right it did not (no pun intended), but it did not stop LM from looking into the woods prior to this. And more clear lies. That it was Jodi's mother who ASKED LM to come up to Easthouse's that night.
Re-write away at the case guys, perhaps on your next blog you can wear a pointed cap with a capital D - And Ms Lean can earn some money for surgery, to have her nose size decreased! - Just a thought.