Or put in which had no relevance ?
For me the Metodo3/Correia collusion is conspicuous by its absence.
As to what was put in, Gail Cooper without a doubt. This is what Rebelo said about her in the final report.
Now in an advanced phase of the investigation, pages 3965 to 4113, there arises, related to the private investigation developed by the McCANN couple, and publicly announced by their spokesman, CLARENCE MITCHELL, the alleged existence of a suspect, which, supposedly, was undertaking a collection in Praia da Luz, at the time of the disappearance. A fotofit was created of this individual by a witness – GAIL COOPER – who saw him, page 3979.
From the beginning and immediately, this was compared with the photo-fit from JANE TANNER, and despite hers not having a face, page 3977, she alleged they were the same person, with an approximately 80% certainty.
In order to assess the credibility of the description and of the drawing, it is important to highlight that the witness GAIL COOPER, was heard for the first time and in a very detailed fashion [emphasis in the report], by the British authorities (see page 3982), then affirming that she saw this person only one time , in a collection done at the door of the residence she was occupying during her holidays.
However, a few months later, in a new deposition, the same witness affirms that she saw this individual three times (one of which he was watching, in a strange way, the children at the Paraíso Restaurant), during her stay in Luz, information which she did not supply at the time of her first deposition to the police in the UK.