Sceptics beliefs ?

[Wonderfulspam]

Who were they going to demonstrate that to?  They were asked to vacate the apartment in the middle of the night.

I'm talking about Robelo's request for a reconstruction, a year later, which didn't take place, hence the investigation ended.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2039181/Madeleine-McCann-reconstruction-called-off-by-Portuguese-Police.html

[Wonderfulspam]

Have you been following the mass shooting in NZ?  50 people dead and 40 or more wounded and the whole incident live streamed on Facebook.  A person caught 17 minutes after the incident started.

I'm struggling to presume him innocent.

#

Have you seen the video?

[Robittybob1]

#

Have you seen the video?

No I haven't.

[Erngath]

Off to watch the final episode of the Victim
Very involving of internet speculation?
 

[Wonderfulspam]

No I haven't.

I have. Would you like to see it?

[Robittybob1]

I'm talking about Robelo's request for a reconstruction, a year later, which didn't take place, hence the investigation ended.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2039181/Madeleine-McCann-reconstruction-called-off-by-Portuguese-Police.html

I don't believe that there was any intention to have a reconstruction.   But because certain members of the Tapas 9 were in fear of what might happen they refused to attend.   

[Robittybob1]

I have. Would you like to see it?

Not really. 

[Wonderfulspam]

I don't believe that there was any intention to have a reconstruction.   But because certain members of the Tapas 9 were in fear of what might happen they refused to attend.   

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/1584329/Madeleine-McCann-parents-asked-to-return-to-Portugal-for-reconstruction.html

[Wonderfulspam]

Not really.

You're missing out there.
I watched it twice. He certainly left his mark.
I think the MSM do a dis service in their censorship of events like these.

[G-Unit]

I did assume that it was to continue the investigation into their missing child.
What do you believe they were trying to achieve?

I have to say you puzzle me. I don't care what you believe or assume about the McCanns, their friends or the police.You can think what you like.

On the other hand you seem interested in learning and understanding why other people think what they think. When they tell you, however, you just reject their views out of hand. 

I get the impression that you're convinced that you're right and that anyone who doesn't agree with you is wrong. I find that somewhat arrogant to be honest.

[Venturi Swirl]

What part of 'no' at the beginning of the response is deflection?

And to be clear, I have admitted it's extenuating circumstances, under duress / pressure after innumerable banal interviews. I even yield to the fact that they never shy away from the scrutiny, particularly the first years. But I maintain that this specific reaction is at odds with the refutation of the impertinent question, given that he probably girded his loins knowing he would likely be asked.

What I find odd is that this interview, over a year after Madeleine’s disappearance, was the thing that you say triggered your disbelief, not all the other stuff that had already convinced most sceptics that they were as guilty as hell.  Was this interview your first encounter with the case?

[Robittybob1]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/1584329/Madeleine-McCann-parents-asked-to-return-to-Portugal-for-reconstruction.html

"Senior Portuguese police are sitting in on the interviews but are not allowed to question anyone themselves. Over the next three days, they will interview all of the so-called Tapas Seven." 
So these events happened at the time of the rogatory interviews.

That article shows there were a lot of unresolved issues to be defined before the Tapas 9 would agree to a revisit to Portugal.  I don't think these issues were ever resolved. 

[The General]

What I find odd is that this interview, over a year after Madeleine’s disappearance, was the thing that you say triggered your disbelief, not all the other stuff that had already convinced most sceptics that they were as guilty as hell.  Was this interview your first encounter with the case?

I'll be honest, I didn't see any of this material contemporaneously really.
It's only after stumbling upon the rise of the Youtube sensationalist and pretend sleuths that I started digging. I've changed my point of view about 30 times. So when I chanced upon this I just thought.....'yeh, bit cringy that'.

[Eleanor]

"Senior Portuguese police are sitting in on the interviews but are not allowed to question anyone themselves. Over the next three days, they will interview all of the so-called Tapas Seven." 
So these events happened at the time of the rogatory interviews.

That article shows there were a lot of unresolved issues to be defined before the Tapas 9 would agree to a revisit to Portugal.  I don't think these issues were ever resolved.

The Tapas 7 asked for various assurances which Rebelo refused to give.

[Venturi Swirl]

I'll be honest, I didn't see any of this material contemporaneously really.
It's only after stumbling upon the rise of the Youtube sensationalist and pretend sleuths that I started digging. I've changed my point of view about 30 times. So when I chanced upon this I just thought.....'yeh, bit cringy that'.

Fair enough.