McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[G-Unit]

I think you'll find they were very much involved in 2010 when dealing with the first part of the action.

A request was lodged with the SC for an 'exceptional review' of the Appeal Court's decision to overturn the book ban. The Supreme Court refused the review.
http://madeleinemccann.org/blog/2014/04/20/mccanns-appeal-to-the-supreme-court/

[Alice Purjorick]

The report has been on record for 9 years & the filing article was never questioned by the SC first time round when it came to the question of libel.

So?

[misty]

Did yoiu when you referred to me in those terms ?

I asked you a question rather than posting a statement as fact.

[stephen25000]

I asked you a question rather than posting a statement as fact.

Didn't sound like that to me.

[misty]

A request was lodged with the SC for an 'exceptional review' of the Appeal Court's decision to overturn the book ban. The Supreme Court refused the review.
http://madeleinemccann.org/blog/2014/04/20/mccanns-appeal-to-the-supreme-court/

Fair enough - but 2 sets of Appeal Court judges must have read the report & didn't raise the issue.

[misty]

Didn't sound like that to me.

Perhaps you'd tell us what my question did sound like to you before you delete everything.

[G-Unit]

Fair enough - but 2 sets of Appeal Court judges must have read the report & didn't raise the issue.

I'm not so well up on their judgements. Did Duarte use 'the archiving dispatch cleared them' argument in her appeals to those courts? Bear in mind the SC judges wouldn't have examined it if she hadn't tried to use it as 'evidence of innocence'.

[stephen25000]

Perhaps you'd tell us what my question did sound like to you before you delete everything.

You made a goading post. Would you like me to delete it for you ?

[misty]

You made a goading post. Would you like me to delete it for you ?

It was a perfectly reasonable response to your goading post.

[misty]

I'm not so well up on their judgements. Did Duarte use 'the archiving dispatch cleared them' argument in her appeals to those courts? Bear in mind the SC judges wouldn't have examined it if she hadn't tried to use it as 'evidence of innocence'.

Neither am I well-informed about the first set. However, the paragraphs in the archiving report concerning the lack of evidence regarding a specific crime must surely have been given great consideration when judging if the book was factual or libellous. When I have more time I will read the transcripts.

[stephen25000]

It was a perfectly reasonable response to your goading post.

What was goading about...........

'pray tell and what happened then ? '

[misty]

What was goading about...........

'pray tell and what happened then ? '

If you can't see it then I can't help you.

[stephen25000]

If you can't see it then I can't help you.

I appear to have touched a sore point. Would you care to explain ?

[Brietta]

With reference to the Morais blog item featuring M Carvalho ... still no link to the original?

[misty]

With reference to the Morais blog item featuring M Carvalho ... still no link to the original?

I don't think there is one Brietta. I have googled sections both in English & after translating them into Portuguese but there are no results other than the Morais source.