McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Alice Purjorick]

I'm sure the McCanns will be aware of this ....I've given my opinion on what the McCann's will be objecting to....
And what they will ask the court to consider....the quote I supplied sums it up imo

Where?
Give post numbers.

[Brietta]

I think the best we can do is wait for more information. Just a case of waiting to see if presuming the McCann lawyers have submitted an application to the court on their behalf; then if the application will be considered.  After that it will possibly be a very long wait for resolution one way or the other.

Just a waiting game really.

[Mr Gray]

What is your experience in law. European or otherwise.

Before you give the inevitable response, I don't proclaim to.

However, through my contacts, I know a Barrister who has knowledge of this field of law, and asked his opinion.

you say you have asked a barrister his opinion ...would you like to share as the posts you have made on the topic dont really indicate any professional knowledge..imo

[Mr Gray]

you say you have asked a barrister his opinion ...would you like to share as the posts you have made on the topic dont really indicate any professional knowledge..imo

So what was his opinion..it would be good to have some professional input

[John]

I have been down this road, it is a very slow process as the Application moves through the various stages.

An Application to the ECHR is simply a matter of filling out several pages of a standard booklet and submitting it, no fee involved.  The McCanns should have heard by now if their Application has been accepted.

[Mr Gray]

I have been down this road, it is a very slow process as the Application moves through the various stages.

An Application to the ECHR is simply a matter of filling out several pages of a standard booklet and submitting it, no fee involved.  The McCanns should have heard by now if their Application has been accepted.

interesting ....but as they have said they wont be giving a running commentary. We will probably have to wait until the case is listed before anything is posted online which of course could be some time

[John]

interesting ....but as they have said they wont be giving a running commentary. We will probably have to wait until the case is listed before anything is posted online which of course could be some time

I suspect it has been rejected.

[Mr Gray]

I suspect it has been rejected.

based on what...Im fairly certain it will be accepted

[Mr Gray]

based on what...Im fairly certain it will be accepted

The acceptance criteria is quite straightforward forward and as far as I can see the McCann's application should satisfy all the criteria and be accepted. If anyone thinks it shouldn't it would be good to explain on what basis it will be rejected... otherwise their opinion doesn't carry a lot of weight...imo

[slartibartfast]

The acceptance criteria is quite straightforward forward and as far as I can see the McCann's application should satisfy all the criteria and be accepted. If anyone thinks it shouldn't it would be good to explain on what basis it will be rejected... otherwise their opinion doesn't carry a lot of weight...imo

Repeating an opinion does not make it a fact.

[G-Unit]

The acceptance criteria is quite straightforward forward and as far as I can see the McCann's application should satisfy all the criteria and be accepted. If anyone thinks it shouldn't it would be good to explain on what basis it will be rejected... otherwise their opinion doesn't carry a lot of weight...imo

Ninety percent of applications are rejected. So far you haven't explained which of the McCann's human rights you think have been breached and how. Until you do that your opinion carries no weight either. Make your case!

[Mr Gray]

Ninety percent of applications are rejected. So far you haven't explained which of the McCann's human rights you think have been breached and how. Until you do that your opinion carries no weight either. Make your case!

my opinin is that the application will be accepted and I have clearly expalined which human rights have been affected so by your argument my opinion carries weight

[Mr Gray]

Repeating an opinion does not make it a fact.

Thats why my post contains..imo

[stephen25000]

The mccanns human rights have not been affected.

They brought the case.

They failed.

It is sour grapes and/or attempted delaying tactics which has led to this attempt to go to the E.C.H.R., after first saying they wouldn't, according to sources in the press, of course.

I.M.E.O. of course.

Have they paid up yet ?

We will find out shortly, Companies House Accounts due by the 31 st December 2017.

[Mr Gray]

The mccanns human rights have not been affected.

They brought the case.

They failed.

It is sour grapes and/or attempted delaying tactics which has led to this attempt to go to the E.C.H.R., after first saying they wouldn't, according to sources in the press, of course.

I.M.E.O. of course.

Have they paid up yet ?

We will find out shortly, Companies House Accounts due by the 31 st December 2017.

thats just your opinion....what did your barrister friend say........imo they have been affected and my legal friends agree with me