I know there was a time frame within the application had to be submitted ... having acknowledged it ... I think it will take time for the wheels of bureaucracy to grind over a consideration and decision period to determine whether the case will be heard or not.
One case won't take precedence over another. There will be a queue of cases every one of which will be of paramount importance to the people who have brought them.
No body is going to leap frog to the top of that queue. So the virtue of patience will have to be the order of the day.
Well once again we are dependent on the follow through for as I do believe the McCanns have a case.
I find the Supreme Court finding relating to the failed re-enactment unfairly blamed the failure on the McCanns. The McCanns were arguidos at the time and had never refused to attend. It appears to be Jes Wilkins and Rachael who don't agree to attend.
It was difficult to arrange a date that suited and the PJ seemed reluctant to issue summonses in order to force attendance.
Rachael appears to have no active role in the disappearance of Madeleine so I don't understand how her non-participation should have stopped the re-enactment happening.
It certainly should not be blamed on the McCanns and no consequence of the failure to perform the re-enactment should reflect on the guilt of the McCanns.
