McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Alice Purjorick]

That's an easy one... On a McCann victory

That wasn't an option for the bet.

[Mr Gray]

That wasn't an option for the bet.

Yes it was ...there are two options...the mccanns are sucesful...or not

[Robittybob1]

That wasn't an option for the bet.

Explain it again please?

[G-Unit]

Well who else is going to supply any evidence.... And what evidence would you expect... If Kate could supply evidence of an open window that would be important

Nope, you still haven't got it. What does 277/1 say?

[Mr Gray]

You claimed the judges, said the case couldn't  be re-opened if it was archived under 277/1

[Angelo222]

I'm sure if Maddie is still alive she wouldn't agree with a lot on this firum... But you are, taking things off topic

I think you are letting your emotions cloud your reasoning.  The McCanns had little thought for their daughter's human rights when they went out dining and drinking while she was left alone to cry and bowl.  Do you not realise the European Court will take this into consideration when looking at what happened in Portugual?

[Mr Gray]

I think you are letting your emotions cloud your reasoning.  The McCanns had little thought for their daughter's human rights when they went out dining and drinking while she was left alone to cry and bowl.  Do you not realise the European Court will take this into consideration when looking at what happened in Portugual?

The ECHR will not take that view into account... You and others make the mistake that supporters are emotionally involved... Total rubbish... I see far more emotion in your posts...

[G-Unit]

You claimed the judges, said the case couldn't  be re-opened if it was archived under 277/1

They did.

[Mr Gray]

They did.

Then they we're wrong because it was reopened

[G-Unit]

Then they we're wrong because it was reopened

Thereby affirming the judge's opinions that it was archived under Article 277/2.

[Mr Gray]

Thereby affirming the judge's opinions that it was archived under Article 277/2.

That's not what the, archiving report says

[slartibartfast]

That's not what the, archiving report says

Which was corrected by the SC, as they said, it was the words that mattered rather the the referenced article.

[Mr Gray]

Which was corrected by the SC, as they said, it was he words that mattered rather the the referenced article.

corrected when..2017...so when the investigation was reopened it was still under 277/1....fact

so its not the article taht matters but the words...that doesnt sound very precise to me...the law needs to be precise

[Mr Gray]

It was the words that mattered rather the the referenced article.

that sounds a pretty poor way to run a legal system imo,,,there are rules...but they can be ignored

[slartibartfast]

that sounds a pretty poor way to run a legal system imo

There speaks a bureaucrat....