Author Topic: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights  (Read 530344 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Sunny

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2235 on: September 30, 2018, 08:35:53 PM »
Portugal law has not stayed the same....its been influenced by the ECHR...i will add...imo...so I do not have to supply a cite

Recent Legal Changes (on defamation laws in Portugal)

N/A

http://legaldb.freemedia.at/legal-database/portugal/
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2236 on: September 30, 2018, 08:37:52 PM »
Recent Legal Changes (on defamation laws in Portugal)

N/A

http://legaldb.freemedia.at/legal-database/portugal/

The SC quoted ECHR law in this case proving they were influenced by it....why eslse would they quote it

Offline slartibartfast

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2237 on: September 30, 2018, 08:39:18 PM »
The SC quoted ECHR law in this case proving they were influenced by it....why eslse would they quote it

The Law will not change.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2238 on: September 30, 2018, 08:42:49 PM »
The Law will not change.

the interpretation of the law is what is changing.....why else would the SC quote ECHR cases if they were not influenced by it

Online Eleanor

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2239 on: September 30, 2018, 08:44:22 PM »
the interpretation of the law is what is changing.....why else would the SC quote ECHR cases if they were not influenced by it

Correct.  It is the interpretation of the law that would change.

Offline G-Unit

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2240 on: September 30, 2018, 09:01:14 PM »
I would say anyone who believes in justice would be offended by what amaral has said and what he has been allowed to get away with..its an affront to justice imo...and will be corrected by the ECHR

is is what the investigation said on 10th September 2007. Does that offend you?

From everything that was exposed from the AUTOS, we conclude that:
A) The minor Madeleine McCann died in the apartment 5A of the Ocean Club resort, on the night of May 3rd of 2007;

B) It was performed a simulation of kidnapping;

C) In order to avoid the death [alarm] of the minor before 22H00, it was created a situation of the children's surveillance by the McCann while the children slept;

D) Kate McCann and Gerald McCann are involved in the occultation of the cadaver of their child Madeleine McCann;

E) At this moment, there seems that there aren't strong indicia that the death of the minor didn't happen due to a tragic accident;

F) From what was obtained until now, everything points out that the McCann, as self-defence, didn't want to deliver immediately and voluntarily the cadaver, existing a strong possibility that the same was transported from the initial place of deposition. This situation is susceptible to raise questions about the circumstances under which the death of the minor occurred.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm
« Last Edit: September 30, 2018, 10:51:44 PM by slartibartfast »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2241 on: September 30, 2018, 09:07:50 PM »
I would say anyone who believes in justice would be offended by what amaral has said and what he has been allowed to get away with..its an affront to justice imo...and will be corrected by the ECHR

is is what the investigation said on 10th September 2007. Does that offend you?

From everything that was exposed from the AUTOS, we conclude that:
A) The minor Madeleine McCann died in the apartment 5A of the Ocean Club resort, on the night of May 3rd of 2007;

B) It was performed a simulation of kidnapping;

C) In order to avoid the death [alarm] of the minor before 22H00, it was created a situation of the children's surveillance by the McCann while the children slept;

D) Kate McCann and Gerald McCann are involved in the occultation of the cadaver of their child Madeleine McCann;

E) At this moment, there seems that there aren't strong indicia that the death of the minor didn't happen due to a tragic accident;

F) From what was obtained until now, everything points out that the McCann, as self-defence, didn't want to deliver immediately and voluntarily the cadaver, existing a strong possibility that the same was transported from the initial place of deposition. This situation is susceptible to raise questions about the circumstances under which the death of the minor occurred.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm

Yes it offends me that the police did not listen to what the eperts said Re the evidence and based on their own misunderstanding  of the evidence took the investigation in completely  the wring direction... Amaral said he could prove Maddie died in the apartment yet in reality there was no evidence to support it
« Last Edit: September 30, 2018, 09:09:40 PM by Robittybob1 »

Offline John

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2242 on: September 30, 2018, 09:27:44 PM »
Just to let everyone know that the Like function is now working again.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Sunny

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2243 on: September 30, 2018, 09:34:07 PM »
Just to let everyone know that the Like function is now working again.

Thank you John  *&(+(+
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2244 on: September 30, 2018, 09:39:32 PM »
then point out where I am wrong...the....its good entertainment..... goad is more than a little tired and overused now

There are several  pages of it already.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2245 on: September 30, 2018, 09:45:16 PM »

There are several  pages of it already.

So you can't point to a single incidence... You used to make some decent points... You've spent too long in bad company...

Offline Montclair

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2246 on: September 30, 2018, 09:52:45 PM »
The SC quoted ECHR law in this case proving they were influenced by it....why eslse would they quote it

The decision of the SC dates from 2010 and although they quoted ECHR rulings to support their decision, the ECHR ruled  in 2017 in favour of the journalist, citing the the right to freedom of expression and opinion.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2247 on: September 30, 2018, 09:55:35 PM »
The decision of the SC dates from 2010 and although they quoted ECHR rulings to support their decision, the ECHR ruled  in 2017 in favour of the journalist, citing the the right to freedom of expression and opinion.

You would need to supply a link to the case to understand  it's relevance... Depends what he was commenting on and the veracity of his statement

Freedom of expression is not a  right to say anything about anyone

Offline Sunny

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2248 on: September 30, 2018, 10:06:21 PM »
You would need to supply a link to the case to understand  it's relevance... Depends what he was commenting on and the veracity of his statement

Freedom of expression is not a  right to say anything about anyone

If it was this one then it was an opinion
https://algarvedailynews.com/news/10833-freedom-of-the-press-more-important-than-supreme-court-president-s-hurt-feelings
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2249 on: September 30, 2018, 10:11:21 PM »