McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[G-Unit]

There is no evidence against the McCann's.   So work it out.

So no documentary, physical, empirical, scientific, material, circumstantial, anectodal, objective, strong, weak, conclusive or hard evidence whatsoever? I would have to disagree I'm afraid. There was insufficient evidence to lay charges, not no evidence.

[Lace]

So no documentary, physical, empirical, scientific, material, circumstantial, anectodal, objective, strong, weak, conclusive or hard evidence whatsoever? I would have to disagree I'm afraid. There was insufficient evidence to lay charges, not no evidence.

Is the evidence you are thinking of the dogs and DNA?   If so they have been ignored by two Police forces.

[Venturi Swirl]

So no documentary, physical, empirical, scientific, material, circumstantial, anectodal, objective, strong, weak, conclusive or hard evidence whatsoever? I would have to disagree I'm afraid. There was insufficient evidence to lay charges, not no evidence.

The police ruled out Smithman being Gerry, what else have you got?  Dog barks that don’t constitute evidence according to their handler, and….what else?

[Wonderfulspam]

Is the evidence you are thinking of the dogs and DNA?   If so they have been ignored by two Police forces.

But not the sighting of Madeleine's father. SY were more willing to publicise the E-Fits of the Smiths sighting than the McCanns themselves were. Bizarrely enough. What a curious anomaly.
Oh well, it's probably not important.

[Wonderfulspam]

The police ruled out Smithman being Gerry, what else have you got?  Dog barks that don’t constitute evidence according to their handler, and….what else?

No abductor.

[Wonderfulspam]

No abductor, & no evidence there ever was one, apart from the McCanns unverifiable claim that Madeleine was abducted.

[Lace]

But not the sighting of Madeleine's father. SY were more willing to publicise the E-Fits of the Smiths sighting than the McCanns themselves were. Bizarrely enough. What a curious anomaly.
Oh well, it's probably not important.

Proof of that please.

[Wonderfulspam]

Proof of that please.

Proof of what?  That the McCanns never publicised the e-fits? Well, they didn't.

[Wonderfulspam]

Spam isn't making that up, Wolters said that Madeleine is dead, Wolters said that the suspect  killed the girl, Wolters said that they have concrete evidence to that fact, I agree it flies in the face of what SY say, there is a disconnect , but why ?

I think it must be something to do with logic, Barrier. Us sceptics just wouldn't understand.

[G-Unit]

Is the evidence you are thinking of the dogs and DNA?   If so they have been ignored by two Police forces.

I wasn't thinking of any evidence in particular, I was just surprised that you said there was no evidence. Did you perhaps mean there wasn't any proof?

[Wonderfulspam]

I wasn't thinking of any evidence in particular, I was just surprised that you said there was no evidence. Did you perhaps mean there wasn't any proof?

I'm reminded of someone. Not seen much of him lately. Perhaps he's been abducted.

[Venturi Swirl]

I wasn't thinking of any evidence in particular, I was just surprised that you said there was no evidence. Did you perhaps mean there wasn't any proof?

Perhaps we could have a new thread entiled “Evidence That The Parents Murdered Madeleine “.  Would that be acceptable?

[Wonderfulspam]

Perhaps we could have a new thread entiled “Evidence That The Parents Murdered Madeleine “.  Would that be acceptable?

To whom?  I wouldn't have a problem with it. Might not be a very long thread granted, but if the mere idea of it is enough to cause supporters ire then it seems it would be totally worth it to me.

[sadie]

When you've finished feeling tickled perhaps you could suggest what evidence could there possibly be, that Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger?

Any suggestions?

Whatever it is, it didn't lead the worlds finest to the murderer for some reason.

There are a number of things, happenings, that have been gone over before ad nauseam

Some are quite small but collectively they make quite a statement.

Suggest that you read back ... but know that you won't.

[Wonderfulspam]

There are a number of things, happenings, that have been gone over before ad nauseam

Some are quite small but collectively they make quite a statement.

Suggest that you read back ... but know that you won't.

Great non answer there. Thanks for your input.