McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Mr Gray]

As with the McCann's application to the ECHR, s/he who laughs last is the one to watch imo.

The ECHR case is over.. You raised it again and I've commented.. God knows how Amaral won.. It certainly wasn't because his book was factually based. If you want to continue claiming it was carry on.
The criminal case against the McCanns is over due to SOL.. Its about time you and other sceptics woke up.. But it's more your nightmare is beginning.. 15 yrs of junk from you and others

[Eleanor]

No. I never asked Kate McCann to write a book with her account of the truth, that was her choice.

Oh Dear.  And she made a lot of money for the Search for Madeleine Fund.

I don't suppose that you asked Amaral to write a book either.  What have you done exactly?  Other than to accuse Madeleine's parents with no evidence at all.

[Venturi Swirl]

I thought it might have dawned on people by now that I don't care what insults are thrown at me. The fact remains that Kate McCann changed her Portuguese lawyer, but her husband didn't. I don't expect explanations, but if Kate chooses to give them they should be clear and complete imo.

You must be very sensitive if you perceived my post to be a personal insult.  I was commenting on your post.  Kate doesn't owe you any explanation, let alone a "clear and complete" one.  It's not her fault that you choose to take every single "less than fulsome" explanation of every single action as something worth remarking upon but what else have you got to discuss after all these years?  Pickings are slim now I guess...

[Venturi Swirl]

No. I never asked Kate McCann to write a book with her account of the truth, that was her choice.

And it was your choice to read it, cogitate over every word and look for little chinks in it in order to sow your seeds of doubt.  Pathetic hobby IMO.

[G-Unit]

And it was your choice to read it, cogitate over every word and look for little chinks in it in order to sow your seeds of doubt.  Pathetic hobby IMO.

My observations are, like Amaral's book, based on factual texts. Other's observations are not, they are opinions.

Unless, of course there are reliable texts which demonstrate that Eddie wasn't a cadaver dog, that Amaral wrote his book purely for profit and that Martin Grime wasn't an expert dog trainer and handler.

[Brietta]

No. I never asked Kate McCann to write a book with her account of the truth, that was her choice.

Kate McCann wrote her book to finance the continuing search for Madeleine.  Nobody else was looking and the money had to come from somewhere.

[G-Unit]

Kate McCann wrote her book to finance the continuing search for Madeleine.  Nobody else was looking and the money had to come from somewhere.

I know what she said.

[Wonderfulspam]

I know what she said.

Yes, Kate claims she wrote the book to finance the 'search' for Madeleine. Obviously, it's up to the reader whether they choose to believe her or not, because there's absolutely no way to be sure of her true motivation. If we're objective about the matter.

[Venturi Swirl]

My observations are, like Amaral's book, based on factual texts. Other's observations are not, they are opinions.

Unless, of course there are reliable texts which demonstrate that Eddie wasn't a cadaver dog, that Amaral wrote his book purely for profit and that Martin Grime wasn't an expert dog trainer and handler.

Hilarious.  Amaral's book is one great big load of opinion based on misunderstanding and "gut feeling".  What "factual texts" provide evidence that Madeleine was drugged with Calpol, hidden by her parents and transported in a hire car 23 days later, after being deep frozen?

[Wonderfulspam]

Oh Dear.  And she made a lot of money for the Search for Madeleine Fund.

I don't suppose that you asked Amaral to write a book either.  What have you done exactly?  Other than to accuse Madeleine's parents with no evidence at all.

It's demonstrably false to say there's no evidence at all as there is a mountain of evidence and all it will take is that missing link for it all to fall into place.

[G-Unit]

Yes, Kate claims she wrote the book to finance the 'search' for Madeleine. Obviously, it's up to the reader whether they choose to believe her or not, because there's absolutely no way to be sure of her true motivation. If we're objective about the matter.

Obviously.

[Wonderfulspam]

Where's Mr Gray?

Could he explain to Eleanor what evidence is, because she obviously doesn't understand.

[G-Unit]

Hilarious.  Amaral's book is one great big load of opinion based on misunderstanding and "gut feeling".  What "factual texts" provide evidence that Madeleine was drugged with Calpol, hidden by her parents and transported in a hire car 23 days later, after being deep frozen?

My there's a lot of hilarity about recently. It was Kate McCann who suggested all three of her children were possibly sedated (three months after the disappearance). Hence Amaral's observations on the subject. Allegedly the initial report from the FSS said DNA very similar to Madeleine's was present in the hire car.

[Mr Gray]

My there's a lot of hilarity about recently. It was Kate McCann who suggested all three of her children were possibly sedated (three months after the disappearance). Hence Amaral's observations on the subject. Allegedly the initial report from the FSS said DNA very similar to Madeleine's was present in the hire car.

Where's your cite for the initial report.. I'm convinced the details you suggest re  total lie.. And you simply believe it

[Venturi Swirl]

My there's a lot of hilarity about recently. It was Kate McCann who suggested all three of her children were possibly sedated (three months after the disappearance). Hence Amaral's observations on the subject. Allegedly the initial report from the FSS said DNA very similar to Madeleine's was present in the hire car.

If you can't understand that Amaral's book was 99% his opinion and his own biased (mis)interpretation of "factual texts"  then I simply can't help you any further...