Again... Opinion not fact
The McCann's case rested on it from the beginning;
page 7
"A) The claimants, concerning the pertinence of the trial, invoke that their constitutionally guaranteed rights are superior to the eventual freedom of expression that the defendants may benefit of, that the book and remaining pieces gathered in this suit are not information and aim at transforming the theory of their involvement in the death of the claimant Madeleine and the concealment of her body in the “result “ of the criminal investigation, and that
Goncalo Amaral violated his duties as a State servant to which he was constrained being an inspector of the Judicial Police. Which is why the judge said on page 31;
"
In view of the requests made, the decision on the merits essentially depends on the answer to the following question :
- Is the book written by the defendant Goncalo Amaral, the adaptation of this book for the audiovisual documentary and the interview given by the same defendant illicit /anti-juridical according to article 484° of the Civil Procedure Code ? "
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6307.0