Can we judge a person's character by their stance on the case?

[Robittybob1]

Davel - How do patients in the UK give consent then?

[Mr Gray]

Davel - How do patients in the UK give consent then?

they sign a consent form. Usually the surgeon will also go through the contra indications as well. The point im making is that although the patient might sign the form they can say at a later time they did not fully understand what they were signing

[Eleanor]

They stand in front of a medical team -stick out their tongue - hold up their hand  showing a palm and a say these words.  "I hope to god I don't die- If I do it is my own fault" they sign a parchment paper in their own blood. all very legal and proper like.

OR

Mibeez they don't!   


I think that Spanish post was for entrtainment only.

 Back on track: the charachter assassination of Brenda Layland by supporters is evidence of unbalanced rehtoric as they were not so quick to judge  fellow supporter-a known paedophile- who so involved himself in charachter assassination of sceptics...

To me that speaks volumes of a persons character!

And yours, it could be said.

[G-Unit]

They stand in front of a medical team -stick out their tongue - hold up their hand  showing a palm and a say these words.  "I hope to god I don't die- If I do it is my own fault" they sign a parchment paper in their own blood. all very legal and proper like.

OR

Mibeez they don't!   


I think that Spanish post was for entrtainment only.

 Back on track: the charachter assassination of Brenda Layland by supporters is evidence of unbalanced rehtoric as they were not so quick to judge  fellow supporter-a known paedophile- who so involved himself in charachter assassination of sceptics...

To me that speaks volumes of a persons character!

Double standards. No objectivity. Bias. It's all there.

[Mr Gray]

Double standards. No objectivity. Bias. It's all there.

Whats the point in raising the Brenda Leyland topic again

[G-Unit]

they sign a consent form. Usually the surgeon will also go through the contra indications as well. The point im making is that although the patient might sign the form they can say at a later time they did not fully understand what they were signing

They can say anything they like. If they want recompense they have to sue for medical malpractice. To win the case they have to prove that the doctor didn't fully inform them. That is why letters are sent to patients setting out what they need to know, to cover the doctors backs.

[Mr Gray]

They can say anything they like. If they want recompense they have to sue for medical malpractice. To ein the case they have to prove that the doctor didn't fully inform them.Thats why letters are sent to patienrs setting out what they need to know, to cover the doctors backs.

And the signature on the consent form does not confirm the patient has read and understood...

[jassi]

What then does it confirm? I presume there is a purpose for getting a signature

[G-Unit]

And the signature on the consent form does not confirm the patient has read and understood...

 As it's irrelevant nobody cares, Davel. Go find evidence of a non Portuguese person succsessfully challenging a PJ
presented statement and it might be relevant. 

[Eleanor]

Well, I guess that we now all have some idea of the character of everyone commenting on this Forum.

[Mr Gray]

As it's irrelevant nobody cares, Davel. Go find evidence of a non Portuguese person succsessfully challenging a PJ
presented statement and it might be relevant.

I don't need to.. It's of no importance because the statements can never be used in court as they are witness statements. Theyre important to you because they are part of what you think is evidence that implicates the McCanns...

[Miss Taken Identity]

Well, I guess that we now all have some idea of the character of everyone commenting on this Forum.

No, I dont think you do. What a patronising thing to say. You are a mod not a person of any importance in anyones life beyong the keyboard and this thread. Keep it real here people.

[G-Unit]

I don't need to.. It's of no importance because the statements can never be used in court as they are witness statements. Theyre important to you because they are part of what you think is evidence that implicates the McCanns...

I find the statements a very useful source of information about all sorts of things. 

[Mr Gray]

I find the statements a very useful source of information about all sorts of things.

Some people find the Bible a useful source of information... Just depends on what you believe to be true
I see the statements as a rough guide but am certain they contain errors

[Venturi Swirl]

No, I dont think you do. What a patronising thing to say. You are a mod not a person of any importance in anyones life beyong the keyboard and this thread. Keep it real here people.

How the hell can you speak for everyone?