According to the PJ they spoke only to Gerry McCann.
Oh ? ... said who?
But taking into consideration that a senior social worker saw fit not to share her concerns with the appropriate authorities until some time after her visit to Luz appears to be a tad remiss and laid back was there any true concern about the welfare of children.
She must have felt secure in the knowledge that the kids were OK or I imagine she would have acted immediately instead of waiting and I rather think she would have wished to know the outcome of any complaint she had flagged up.
For obvious reasons she would not have received feedback from the anonymous letter she wrote to the police in England.
So why would a professional so apparently eager to utilise her expertise that she dropped everything on the morning of the 4th May to reach the seat of the action, provide such an example of bad practice confirming only her unsuitability for the task she selected for herself?