Im happy to accept misunderstandings...but what does it say about the likes of Amaral...Saukonoko...Pat Brown...
sonial poulton....peter mac....R D Hall... when they are unable to separate fact from fantasy....You say you beleive in the truth...these people are spreading lies....they may not realise they are lies...but they are...and the fact they don't realise that shows how ignorant they are
I'm not familiar with Peter Mac and I believe R D Hall to be a useful stooge (he does spread fantasy!).
However Mark Saunokonoko raises valid questions and explains coherently why the McCanns became suspects in involvement in MM's dissappearance. I think that much of the time Dave, you fail to see outside of your tunnel vision and then you protestations that everyone else looks "ignorant" carries little weight. Dogs aside (and I believe you to be wrong on that score - but your logic valid) you rarely offer any substance to your argument. You claim there is evidence that MM was abducted but you never produce it. You clain there is a great deal of evidence that CB was involved but you're taking some circumstantial evidence from the press coupled with some words from a German prosecutor (who seems to be lacking the evidenced to charge anyone) as damning evidence against CB.
You then ignore circumstantial evidence against G and K and instead just try to mock and rubbish the evidence without ever offering any sudstance to your opinion. Dr Perlin is an expert scientist who claims he can make sense of the DNA evidence. You like the rest of us are an internet armchair detective, and yet you lack the common sense to see that when it comes down to expert testimony Dr Perlin is somewhat more qualified than you are in the field of forensic science. There are ways you could argue against him with valid points - but instead you try to rubbish people like you do with Mark Saunokonoko et al. Imo it actually weakens your argument. To be fair to you Brietta is even worse. This is not a personal attack on either of you but an observation on your posts. You both seem to be in total denial that it was perfectly valid to make the parents arguidos. There are questions and red flags that should be investigated. Not least the human cellular material collected after the dog alerts zand the fact that in some areas in the apartment Eddie alerted but Keela did not.
