Author Topic: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?  (Read 172242 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1680 on: July 19, 2020, 05:27:24 PM »
Zampo was a trained cadaver dog that put an inncoent man in jail, no?

I don't believe his training was comparible to UK police training.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1681 on: July 19, 2020, 05:30:19 PM »
I don't believe his training was comparible to UK police training.

If you look at eddie's success stories...there don't seem to be many

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1682 on: July 19, 2020, 05:33:39 PM »
I don't believe his training was comparible to UK police training.
Why do you believe that?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline G-Unit

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1683 on: July 19, 2020, 05:34:26 PM »
If you look at eddie's success stories...there don't seem to be many

Don't forget that he was successful when he didn't alert as well as when he did.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Online Eleanor

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1684 on: July 19, 2020, 05:36:52 PM »
I don't believe his training was comparible to UK police training.

So where was Zampo trained?

Online Eleanor

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1685 on: July 19, 2020, 05:45:01 PM »
Don't forget that he was successful when he didn't alert as well as when he did.

What?  Eddie didn't alert so he was successful?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1686 on: July 19, 2020, 05:50:06 PM »
What?  Eddie didn't alert so he was successful?
Eddie farted rainbows too don’t you know?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Online Eleanor

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1687 on: July 19, 2020, 06:15:26 PM »
Eddie farted rainbows too don’t you know?

Poor Eddie.  Rest in Peace.  For a while he was the most famous dog in the world for all of the wrong reasons.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1688 on: July 19, 2020, 06:30:30 PM »
According to what we read in the press and TV. It would be interesting to see the evidence he  was convicted on...was it just his alleged confession to another prisoner....more evidence against CB it would seem.

No there isn’t.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Lace

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1689 on: July 19, 2020, 08:13:57 PM »
Right there with Morse and Grime, as you would know if you read the link I provided.

So are you saying that Keela didn't alert to the blood on the pillow in Bianca's bedroom?   Also if the blanket had bee around Bianca then it would have had blood on it  didn't Keela alert to the blanket?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1690 on: July 19, 2020, 08:18:18 PM »
No there isn’t.

so what evidence is there against Stone...It seems just the testimony of  a friend. Did he have any previous...no

Offline faithlilly

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1691 on: July 19, 2020, 08:19:56 PM »
so what evidence is there against Stone...It seems just the testimony of  a friend. Did he have any previous...no

I think you need to read up on the case before we can discuss it.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1692 on: July 19, 2020, 08:23:23 PM »
I think you need to read up on the case before we can discuss it.

correct me if im wrong...what evidence is there against him....apart from the alleged confession. i don't particularly want to discuss it.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1693 on: July 19, 2020, 08:38:52 PM »
correct me if im wrong...what evidence is there against him....apart from the alleged confession. i don't particularly want to discuss it.

A circumstantial case was made against Stone. He was suspected because of previous offending. I think it’s now widely accepted that he’s not guilty of the murder of the Russells. Brueckner, as things stand now, is in the same boat.

With the dog alerts and anomalies in their statements a circumstantial case could also have been made against the parents, if their had been the will.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1694 on: July 19, 2020, 08:45:14 PM »
A circumstantial case was made against Stone. He was suspected because of previous offending. I think it’s now widely accepted that he’s not guilty of the murder of the Russells. Brueckner, as things stand now, is in the same boat.

With the dog alerts and anomalies in their statements a circumstantial case could also have been made against the parents, if their had been the will.

Dog alertrs are BS and not admissible....
« Last Edit: July 19, 2020, 09:11:41 PM by Eleanor »