Author Topic: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?  (Read 170926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1545 on: July 13, 2020, 04:28:31 PM »
But true isn’t it Dave. You can’t show they weren’t human bone fragments.
I couldn't give s toss for such a pathetic claim

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1546 on: July 13, 2020, 04:48:42 PM »
But true isn’t it Dave. You can’t show they weren’t human bone fragments.
Perhaps you could provide evidence that they were.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1547 on: July 13, 2020, 04:55:18 PM »
Perhaps you could provide evidence that they were.

I don’t need to. It’s not me that is trying to discredit Eddie’s alert. The fact is you can’t discredit Eddie’s alert at the hell hole of child abuse at HdlG since you can’t prove he didn’t alert to human remains.... and didn’t Eddie do well on all those preliminary tests!

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1548 on: July 13, 2020, 05:05:18 PM »
I don’t need to. It’s not me that is trying to discredit Eddie’s alert. The fact is you can’t discredit Eddie’s alert at the hell hole of child abuse at HdlG since you can’t prove he didn’t alert to human remains.... and didn’t Eddie do well on all those preliminary tests!
I can’t prove he didn’t alert to the bones of the Loch Ness monster or Lord Lucan either, but I can prove he alerted to a spermy old tissue, which was useful.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1549 on: July 13, 2020, 05:14:16 PM »
I can’t prove he didn’t alert to the bones of the Loch Ness monster or Lord Lucan either, but I can prove he alerted to a spermy old tissue, which was useful.

Of course you can. Well done you!

If that tissue was near some human remains I think you’ll find that it was those Eddie alerted to. Eddie doesn’t alert to sperm. Why do you want to discredit the dog so badly?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1550 on: July 13, 2020, 05:46:32 PM »
Of course you can. Well done you!

If that tissue was near some human remains I think you’ll find that it was those Eddie alerted to. Eddie doesn’t alert to sperm. Why do you want to discredit the dog so badly?
@)(++(* Why did Martin Grime not say that and instead say that the alert was within normal parameters or whatever similar term he used?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1551 on: July 13, 2020, 05:47:00 PM »
Of course you can. Well done you!

If that tissue was near some human remains I think you’ll find that it was those Eddie alerted to. Eddie doesn’t alert to sperm. Why do you want to discredit the dog so badly?

For me its because there are so many lies told about the cadaver dog

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1552 on: July 13, 2020, 05:52:14 PM »
For me its because there are so many lies told about the cadaver dog

Obviously the FBI didn't share your opinion, though.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1553 on: July 13, 2020, 05:54:35 PM »
Obviously the FBI didn't share your opinion, though.


Its not opinion.

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1554 on: July 13, 2020, 06:10:15 PM »

Its not opinion.

It is your opinion that some of Eddie's alerts was not to cadaver odour in Apartment 5a.

It's opinion that the dogs are of little value. It's not an opinion shared by the FBI.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1555 on: July 13, 2020, 06:49:58 PM »
It is your opinion that some of Eddie's alerts was not to cadaver odour in Apartment 5a.

It's opinion that the dogs are of little value. It's not an opinion shared by the FBI.


its not opinion that lies have been told about the dogs its  a fact. ive never said the dogs are of little value. the dogs are very useful when used properly.

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1556 on: July 13, 2020, 07:46:00 PM »

its not opinion that lies have been told about the dogs its  a fact. ive never said the dogs are of little value. the dogs are very useful when used properly.

Absolutely and Martin Grime was thoroughly professional throughout. This obviously wasn’t lost on the FBI.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1557 on: July 13, 2020, 08:40:34 PM »
For me its because there are so many lies told about the cadaver dog

Who is being accused of lying?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline The General

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1558 on: July 14, 2020, 07:29:22 AM »
Who is being accused of lying?
Nobody - apart from Martin Grime by Davel.
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline G-Unit

Re: Dog Alerts- Evidence or not?
« Reply #1559 on: July 14, 2020, 08:05:03 AM »
Nobody - apart from Martin Grime by Davel.

I do hope not. In my opinion that's libellous.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0