The Sunday Times Apologises...yet e-fits withheld from public view for 5 years?

[jassi]

Should they not have appeared in Kate's book? It is ,after all, claimed to be the definitive work on the subject.

[Redblossom]

Should they not have appeared in Kate's book? It is ,after all, claimed to be the definitive work on the subject.

You would think they should, being efits of a man seeing carryng a four yr blonde girl in pyjamas near to the ocean club on the night...but no....a charity collector called creepy two weeks earlier was more of a suspect? Or a woman in barcelona days later, drunk and noone knowing what she was on about and the witness coming  forward two yrs later

 

Lets not forget the prime person SY is searchng for is nowhere to be seen on the mccanns official findmadeleine website....unless you look really hard....lol

And the line that they sent the efits to the pj and lp in 2009 is heresay......sy will have had them but they didnt...they had to ask permission to get them!!.....even if they did send them in 2009 fact remans they sat on them for a year before doing so.....why is that??? Uncomfortable questions for the apologisers

[Benice]

You would think they should, being efits of a man seeing carryng a four yr blonde girl in pyjamas near to the ocean club on the night...but no....a charity collector called creepy two weeks earlier was more of a suspect? Or a woman in barcelona days later, drunk and noone knowing what she was on about and the witness coming  forward two yrs later

 

Lets not forget the prime person SY is searchng for is nowhere to be seen on the mccanns official findmadeleine website....unless you look really hard....lol

And the line that they sent the efits to the pj and lp in 2009 is heresay......sy will have had them but they didnt...they had to ask permission to get them!!.....even if they did send them in 2009 fact remans they sat on them for a year before doing so.....why is that??? Uncomfortable questions for the apologisers

The answer is - we don't know why - because we don't have the details.      While this is the case I won't speculate.    On the other hand while this is the case the sceptics will speculate- and of course that speculation will all be to the McCanns detriment.   But when was it ever anything else?

I'm assuming that unlike us -  SY do know all the details - and that's all that matters IMO. 

[Redblossom]

The answer is - we don't know why - because we don't have the details.      While this is the case I won't speculate.    On the other hand while this is the case the sceptics will speculate- and of course that speculation will all be to the McCanns detriment.   But when was it ever anything else?

I'm assuming that unlike us -  SY do know all the details - and that's all that matters IMO.

one reason given and a quote from the Fund spokesman was they couldnt afford to investigate the smith sighting....




 >@@(*&)

I doubt it would cost much to publicise an efit! And such a crucial one..carry on not speculating then....