Sandra Lean was still affiliated with WAP and it wasn’t until July 2014 that it was made known - “she would not be involved with the website and forum set up to promote Mitchell’s cause as “I no longer have power of attorney”
I don’t believe the reason Sandra Lean “
would not be involved with the website and forum” because as is stated, “
I no longer have power of attorney,” and I’ve wondered if it had anything to do with her and Billy Middleton?
Did she finally recognise in him what many of us had recognised long before?
Or was it a combination of the above and other factors?
Having serious mental health conditions does not automatically suggest that person culpable of murder or indeed a danger to others.
I find the comment “previous attacks on women” misleading and requiring explanation of alleged attacks; on whom, what was done, how many times? etc. Where’s the proof or is she attempting to replicate the stories told about Luke Mitchell.
I am aware [Name removed] allegedly went to Sandra Leans house (several years ago) presumably because he was angry with her stance/campaigning etc. I think Billy Middleton was staying with her at the time of this event and IMO he was far more of a threat to her and her daughters than [Name removed] ever was.
I don’t condone the alleged event with [Name removed] btw but dangerous individuals with low empathy are often hidden in plain sight by a mask of normalcy.
What “
previous attacks on women?” Is she referring to herself and herself only and has embellished this to make it sound like more than one? Like she did with my email reply to her here
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10836.msg540924#msg540924The following was written by Sandra Lean after I had told John Lamberton about the phonecall I received from her on a Sunday telling me she’d had to drive Billy Middleton to the airport after an
incident between her and him (Middleton) at her home, some of which was witnessed by her daughter. Which ended with Billy Middleton leaving and her and her youngest daughter subsequently finding him covered in blood somewhere on the streets of Edinburgh.
From November 2010:
"My motivation has been called into question, my honesty and integrity trashed, all because I chose to devote seven years of my life trying to help people. Yes, I know you were at the centre of a hate campaign, but that wasn't my doing and I played no part in it whatsoever - nobody could ever have used a single word I had said about you, because there was nothing to use.
" what hurts is that you could not step back, knowing me as I thought you did, and ask yourself, is there perhaps another explanation for this. Nope, instant public condemnation, in the belief that you were being attacked, when, in fact, I was trying to defend you.
That your words are being used to paint me as dishonest and unreliable, and that in turn is being used to undermine Luke's case, is probably one of the worst experiences in all of this. I thought you were my friend.
There was absolutely no intention to 'scapegoat' you for anything
My post was an attempt to take the wind out of his sails by saying, Yes, Stephanie did talk to John, but not in the sinister/negative way he is trying to portray it. What John has done is take an innocent mistake by Stephanie and turn it into a weapon for him to use against others http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg384700.html#msg384700
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg384647.html#msg384647With hindsight, the
incident to which I refer is relevant to Luke Mitchell’s case, as Sandra Lean obviously recognised around the time this all happened. As did John Lamberton.
After said
incident Sandra Lean and Billy Middleton became business partners?
How and why did Sandra Lean fail to recognise this as abuse? Or did she recognise it was abuse and went into partenership with him anyway? Did he con her to go into partnership with him?
This is relevant for so many reasons.
In her interview with James English she refers to her daughters being around about the same age as [Name removed] etc etc and why would she be doing what she’s doing etc etc she refers to her daughters safety etc
Yet the Billy Middleton
incident (The same Billy Middleton who received a verdict of not proven of causing the death of his baby daughter) didn’t deter her? When she described the
incident she said there was “
a cigarette paper” between us. Her youngest daughter was a witness and had to step in to intervene.
There was another
incident of him leaving burning cigarette ends in the ashtray, whilst they were all in the house.
Doesn’t this suggest double standards? Lack of insight? Poor judgement?