Part 5...Why didn't Clegg give Dr Vincent Tabak a full and deserving Defence? Why does it appear that he hasn't Investigated anything with regards to Dr Vincent Tabak? Did he think it would be an open and shut case ??? Did he not bargain on Dr Vincent Tabak being a very clever man??
Did common sense not prevail?? If a highly educated man has committed a serious crime such as Murder, and the only apparent evidence connecting him to said Murders are his apparent Confession and a list of searches done on a computer... Then this highly educated man would have dumped said computer in the largest body of water when he went to Holland to visit his family...
If he kept the sock as a trophy and wanted to get rid of that evidence then he too could have dumped that in a body of water in Holland... Same with the pizza box.... Dr Vincent tabak's car is NOT searched until he is arrested... So all of the evidence.. Bicycle cover/ sock /pizza etc... could have been disposed of in Holland... which is the logical option for an educated man , whom apparently was not flustered by what had taken place....
No-one was looking in the car.... Dr Vincent tabak could have had it valeted in Holland if he was so worried that there may be a minute piece of evidence left behind... Now that would be covering his tracks.... But we don't get this....
We get Dr Vincent Tabak behaving like an imbicile.. unable to cover his tracks apparently and not only that, volunteering the supposed method and demise of Joanna Yeates. He's apparently cooly shopping in Adsa after this murder buying nothing of importance... Nothing that would indicate he had committed a crime... If he is that cool and collected... why didn't he just dispose of everything in Holland, instead of leaving it on his doorstep in some bins somewhere in Clifton...
What or who should we be questioning when it comes to this case?? I personally am questioning Clegg's ability as a Defence Lawyer, because he doesn't appear to be up to the job....(imo) We as the general public believe that those in a position of power are qualified to be in those positions of power... But this case says otherwise (imo)..
Andrew "Civilian " Mott... not qualified to give evidence at trial as to what condition Joanna Yeates body was or was not in... Same with PC Martin Faithful.... Anyone who could quantify evidence in this case seem not to be at trial with the exception of the limited testimony of Dr Delaney and Dr Carey.... And instead we are left with Dr Vincent Tabak admitting without evidence to back up what he is saying , that he killed and disposed of Joanna yeates in the manner stated in court....
I'm sorry but for me it is not good enough..... I''m now questioning Clegg's ability to be a Criminal Defence Lawyer... I am now questioning When he passed all his exams in relation to Criminal Law he may have done I don't know.... Lawyers specialise in different aspects of Law... Clegg seems to have every aspect of law under his belt and i don't know how....
Overview
William Clegg QC frequently advises foreign governments, international corporations, trade unions and individuals resident here and abroad in relation to all aspects of regulatory offences, compliance, corporate manslaughter, health and safety corruption and sanctions. Has acted for Balfour Beatty, B.E.A. Sainsbury, Mabey & Johnson, Barclays Bank and the Alstom Group.
Has appeared on over 125 cases in the Supreme Court, Administrative Court and Court of Appeal which can be accessed using Lexis Nexis search engine.
Frequently works in partnership with lawyers abroad and has acted with lawyers in the United States, Brunei, Dubai, Russia, The Netherlands, Spain and Bosnia.
Also practices in the field of general crime and has defended journalists employed by “The Sun” and the Head of Security at News International on charges of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and for paying public officials for news stories.
He also defended in numerous cases of current and historic allegations of sexual abuse, murder, manslaughter and general crime.
William Clegg has both chaired and appeared before public inquiries including the inquiry into Ashworth Special Hospital.
What the overview states on 2 Bedford Row's website only covers the basics... It doesn't tell us How and when he was qualified in representing Defendants in Murder trials.... And I apologise for my ignorance, if that is what it is ... But shouldn't you be qualified to represent such clients!
We have lawyers who specialise in different aspects of law for a reason, because no one lawyer could possibly know the Law on everything.... And (imo) Clegg's past record for Defending someone accused of Murder isn't evidence of his ability to Defend Dr Vincent Tabak in this case.... Saying that the high profile cases are evidence of the ability to defend.. are evidence of Clegg's ability to be a Good defence Lawyer doesn't stack up (imo)....
Now if he had done a trial such as OJ Simpson.. then i could clearly see that he was more than capable... But we have nothing like that.... We should have had... The lack of evidence supporting Dr vincent tabak was none existent (imo) and that should have lead to the trial of the century not happening... But that is not the case... It was like a damp squib... The ends only gave us a conviction and not Justice.... (imo)
It is only my opinion that I believe that Clegg isn't qualified to Defend anyone on a serious charge such as Murdrer... And I have a right to have my opinion.... He had proved to me that he is incapable of defending anyone in that position.... And as Clegg himself has said... It's Pefectly Obvious!
It is perfectly obvious that this case needs looking at again... And Perfectly Obvious that people should question what qualifications Clegg has to Defend Murder cases... Because if i can still find fault with this case and no-one will speak of this case... It is perfectly Obvious that it isn't really about Dr Vincent Tabak and whether or not he killed Joanna Yeates... But about the lack of Defending his Defence lawyer did... (imo)
We are at the mercy of people in positions of power and we rely on their education and knowledge to assist us... We are supposed to believe that the truth will prevail and the person who is representing us is fit for such a position... But again I will say for me personally, The Defences lack of Investigating and lack of supporting evidence, suggests to me they didn't have a scooby.... When at the very least Tanja Morson should have taken the stand and not forgetting CJ whom Dr Vincent tabak was apparently trying to implicate....
I could have defended Dr Vincent Tabak better.... I have no formal qualifications, but that doesn't change the fact that I could have Investigated fuller, what Dr Vincent Tabak could or couldn't have done in relation to this crime... Or questioned the evidence that The prosecution brought forth... Or the lack of evidence from the Police linking Dr Vincent Tabak to this crime...
It doesn't change the fact that i could question more than Clegg appears to have done, I shouldn't still be able to post anything on this case... It's frightening to know that someone who has your life in their hands hasn't covered the basics as far as I can tell... But is applauded for there greatness...
So who should we be questioning??? I for one want to question Clegg... Because it appears that not enough was done to Defend a Placid Dutchman who apparently didn't say anything until trial... And therefore i want to know where the evidence is that Dr Vincent Tabak killed Joanna yeates... Because the prosecution didn't have any evidence to support that claim....
And Clegg is left holding the baby... He puts his client on the stand when he shouldn't in my opinion... because without Dr Vincent Tabaks testimony there is no case to answer for!!! (imo).
From what has been made available in this case, I think it only stands to reason why people would question it.... And personally i do not know how Clegg came to be known as The Master Defender... I find myself questioning that opinion especially since Dr Vincent Tabak's Case as of October 2011...
No-one has questioned Cleggs ability.... But maybe they darn't or can't... But I'm just the general public... And i feel we should all start to question what we are told.. instead of relying on what we have heard, because it is my opinion if we just accept any version of events without evidence to support it... Anyone of us could find ourselves in Dr Vincent Tabaks's position... And that is a scary thought!!!
http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/28b474f733f0437e895ea7b0ed4a496dhttps://www.2bedfordrow.co.uk/barrister/william-clegg-qc/https://www.standard.co.uk/news/mother-and-child-died-together-in-ritual-slaughter-6837683.htmlhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3580773/rachel-nickell-murder-killer-robert-napper-son-alex-hanscombe/