Author Topic: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!  (Read 243052 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1110 on: January 19, 2020, 07:52:18 PM »
By him and his supporters of course!  You’re always telling us about what a principled man he is aren’t you?

Nobody’s perfect.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1111 on: January 19, 2020, 07:53:04 PM »
Oh please Faithlilly, spare me the sanctimonious, emotive claptrap.

So which of those things aren’t happening ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1112 on: January 19, 2020, 08:52:28 PM »
So which of those things aren’t happening ?
Well for a start my “nan” isn’t lying in her own urine, she’s kicking up the daisies.  Of course the NHS is in crisis and social care is a massive and growing problem, everyone recognises that.  Both the Tories and Labour committed to spending huge amounts of money on the NHS in their manifestos, Labour were also committed to freedom of movement for all if Diane Abbott was to be believed, which could only have meant an even greater strain on the NHS as anyone could have come to Britain to make use of our NHS for free. 

 I advocated “caring capitalism” but I did not claim that the Tories were advocates of same did I??  You seem to be convinced that I am a Tory simply because I think Jeremy is a useless leader. 
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1113 on: January 19, 2020, 09:25:09 PM »
Oh well you win then.  Because I can’t provide 201 names, then [ censored word]emitism does not exist within the Labour Party and was simply invented by Corbyn’s enemies.  Nice one, enjoy your victory.   8@??)(

I didn’t say [ censored word]emitism didn’t exist, in a party with a membership of half a million, it would be stupid to assume that it didn’t but it didn’t come with Corbyn and he didn’t turn a blind eye to it as his investigation into [ censored word]emitism and the procedures he has put in place to deal with it shows.


And I didn’t ask for 201 members or supporters who have been victims of [ censored word]emitism within the Labour Party, 50 will do, what with it being such a widespread problem that should be easy, surely ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1114 on: January 19, 2020, 09:32:07 PM »
Well for a start my “nan” isn’t lying in her own urine, she’s kicking up the daisies.  Of course the NHS is in crisis and social care is a massive and growing problem, everyone recognises that.  Both the Tories and Labour committed to spending huge amounts of money on the NHS in their manifestos, Labour were also committed to freedom of movement for all if Diane Abbott was to be believed, which could only have meant an even greater strain on the NHS as anyone could have come to Britain to make use of our NHS for free. 

 I advocated “caring capitalism” but I did not claim that the Tories were advocates of same did I??  You seem to be convinced that I am a Tory simply because I think Jeremy is a useless leader.

And while free movement ceases those NHS and social care jobs won’t be  filled which compounds the crisis in understaffing that already exists.

Are you really suggesting that there isn’t a direct connection between the capitalist system we are following atm and the shocking poverty and lack of resources afflicting our public services ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1115 on: January 19, 2020, 10:17:21 PM »
And while free movement ceases those NHS and social care jobs won’t be  filled which compounds the crisis in understaffing that already exists.

Are you really suggesting that there isn’t a direct connection between the capitalist system we are following atm and the shocking poverty and lack of resources afflicting our public services ?
Please supply the data that proves a caring capitalist society (which is what I have advocated) directly causes poverty.  Meanwhile, please look at this list of socialist states and pick the ones you feel have eradicated poverty in their countries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states

Incidentally what exactly was Labour’s position of freedom of movement?  That anyone who wanted to live here from anywhere in the world could do so?
« Last Edit: January 19, 2020, 10:19:49 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1116 on: January 19, 2020, 10:32:27 PM »
Please supply the data that proves a caring capitalist society (which is what I have advocated) directly causes poverty.  Meanwhile, please look at this list of socialist states and pick the ones you feel have eradicated poverty in their countries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states

Incidentally what exactly was Labour’s position of freedom of movement?  That anyone who wanted to live here from anywhere in the world could do so?

A caring capitalist society.....isn’t that an oxymoron?

There is no state, capitalist or socialist, that has completely eradicated poverty.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1117 on: January 19, 2020, 10:48:44 PM »
A caring capitalist society.....isn’t that an oxymoron?

There is no state, capitalist or socialist, that has completely eradicated poverty.
No,  but it is your contention is it not that capitalism is directly responsible for poverty, and that the answer is socialism, so it stands to reason that socialist states should have lower levels of poverty.  Kindly point to those socialist states on the list that you believe have succeeded in significantly reducing poverty in their countries. 

"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1118 on: January 19, 2020, 10:51:19 PM »
Meanwhile, back in the real world

“Indeed, capitalism – in the form of enterprise and trade – has been the driving force behind the most remarkable decline in global poverty ever witnessed in human history. In the past 200 years, extreme poverty has collapsed from a whopping 94% of the entire world population to less than 10% today.

This is even more remarkable when you remember the global population has ballooned from one billion to over seven billion in that time, largely due to better life expectancy. Even now, more than 60,000 people on average are escaping extreme poverty every single day”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/feb/04/capitalism-is-having-an-identity-crisis-but-it-is-still-the-best-system


I couldn’t have put it better myself.  I’m also not interested in a long drawn out argument about which system is better,  I have my views and you have yours, arguing about it won’t change a thing.  And that’s my last word on the subject.
.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1119 on: January 20, 2020, 12:29:36 AM »
No,  but it is your contention is it not that capitalism is directly responsible for poverty, and that the answer is socialism, so it stands to reason that socialist states should have lower levels of poverty.  Kindly point to those socialist states on the list that you believe have succeeded in significantly reducing poverty in their countries.

As I have said before we are the fifth richest country in the world yet have some of the worst rates of inequality in the developed world.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/27/parts-of-england-have-higher-mortality-rates-than-turkey

And it wasn’t socialism that caused those appalling statistics.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1120 on: January 20, 2020, 12:33:55 AM »
Meanwhile, back in the real world

“Indeed, capitalism – in the form of enterprise and trade – has been the driving force behind the most remarkable decline in global poverty ever witnessed in human history. In the past 200 years, extreme poverty has collapsed from a whopping 94% of the entire world population to less than 10% today.

This is even more remarkable when you remember the global population has ballooned from one billion to over seven billion in that time, largely due to better life expectancy. Even now, more than 60,000 people on average are escaping extreme poverty every single day”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/feb/04/capitalism-is-having-an-identity-crisis-but-it-is-still-the-best-system


I couldn’t have put it better myself.  I’m also not interested in a long drawn out argument about which system is better,  I have my views and you have yours, arguing about it won’t change a thing.  And that’s my last word on the subject.
.

Absolutely but you have to agree that under this particular government brand of capitalism has been used to enrich the few while driving more and more families into poverty ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1121 on: January 20, 2020, 08:22:57 AM »
Absolutely but you have to agree that under this particular government brand of capitalism has been used to enrich the few while driving more and more families into poverty ?
My views have been very clear, I have repeatedly said I am not a supporter of Tory policy, I have nothing further to add.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1122 on: January 20, 2020, 08:49:34 AM »
My views have been very clear, I have repeatedly said I am not a supporter of Tory policy, I have nothing further to add.

So if not here, where do you think what you call ‘caring capitalism’ is working ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1123 on: January 20, 2020, 01:40:51 PM »
So if not here, where do you think what you call ‘caring capitalism’ is working ?

You would have to define working... Do you think the UK would be better off under a Marxist govt.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Jeremy Corbyn for PM!!
« Reply #1124 on: January 20, 2020, 02:58:06 PM »
You would have to define working... Do you think the UK would be better off under a Marxist govt.

Could it be much worse ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?