It is important. Why else would you have tried to hoodwink those who follow the case with your ‘strong majority’ hokum?
That was not what the If was about though, was it now!
The only people responsible for attempting to "hoodwink" the public at large are LM and his chief enablers. Little old me on an internet forum, a mere blip in cyber space, isn't that how it goes? Sharing information from other source is in no way attributable to trying to "hoodwink" anyone.
You see Faith, I would need to know that the information is wrong by direct source, if it turns out to be wrong I would adapt to that. There would still be no wilful attempt at hoodwinking anyone, with anything. Unlike your ego, those enablers, who instead of saying that information they adopted was wrong, they still manipulate and try to worm their way out of it all. They dig their heels in and double down!
I have adopted stuff from them, like many others. I have adapted from direct source (transcripts) errors in previous posts I have made. Here I am holding my hands up, admitting that I too was foolish enough to take on board some stuff directly from Ms Lean and co. More fool me. I will say the exact same if that direction turns out to be completely false. But we will have to wait and see what was actually said before that can be ascertained.