Recently others have suggested that slightly less than 100% of information given by witnesses to private investigators was immediately passed to PJ/LP (see Sundae Times apology thread)
I ran a diff program on two versions of a Daily Meal article (the program highlights differences between the two versions).
The paper spoke to a witness on 26/09/07, published the original article on 27/09/07 then changed it on 14/10/07.
What I am interested in is the information was removed by the revision, which is -
1. That the boat sighting was at 2330 on 05/05/07 (the revision removed the time but not the date).
2. That the witness had spoken twice to LP about it (removed in revision).
3. That the witness also saw the person on 06/05/07 (removed in revision).
BTW big credit to
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id70.html for saving this odd revision it has disappeared fromthe Meal and Wayback.
Why was the claim, that the witness had spoken twice to LP, removed?