Author Topic: Strange Witness Statements  (Read 591420 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #885 on: February 21, 2015, 12:03:14 AM »
Hideho, A researcher, so not the files. think I'll stick to the files.

What those dodgy translations or by chance are you translating them yourself ?  @)(++(*
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #886 on: March 31, 2015, 06:23:22 PM »
The meeting ended with a final body blow. Danie Krugel, on whom we had, irrationally, hung so much hope, had produced a report for the PJ based on his findings. His machine had recorded a ‘static signal’ from an area around the beach, close to or on the Rocha Negra cliff. Although this included villas, apartments and other buildings, the implication of the ‘static signal’ was that Madeleine was most likely to be dead and buried there. (Madeleine)
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #887 on: April 04, 2015, 12:46:51 PM »
He states that since the twins were born, he and Kate have gone out at night only once, leaving the children with relatives. He adds that in spite of this he never saw Kate depressed as a result of too much work. He denies that Kate had changed her work habits for reasons related to depressions.

He affirms that his wife never gave him to understand that at some time she had the intention of giving Madeleine into the care of a family member.

Kate's specialty is general medicine, and works two days a week. After the birth of the twins, Kate did not work for a year, on maternity leave, and currently works part-time as above.

It is not true that Madeleine had been crying that night for an hour and 15 minutes, because she was not alone all that time.

On the day of arrival, he does not know if the blinds in Madeleine's room were open or closed. He did not open them again, and does not know if somebody else did. When confronted with a testimony that states having seen the blinds on this window open after their arrival, he says that it was not him who opened them. When asked about the window behind one of the sofas in the living room, he says that yes, he remembers the window but does not remember if the blinds were also closed.

Regarding this sofa, he remembers it was next to the window. He is not sure, but thinks that this sofa was probably a bit closer as his children threw objects behind it, mainly playing cards. When asked, he does not know if any of the children was behind the sofa or passed behind this sofa.

He does not remember what Kate was wearing that night.

The second person to go and check on the children should have been Kate, but Matt offered to go as he was going to check on his own daughter. When Matt returned to the restaurant G. asked him if all was well; Matt replied that all was quiet. G. is not absolutely sure, but he is under the impression that he asked Matt if he entered their apartment, to which Matt replied yes.

He does not remember if he had taken his mobile phone to the restaurant. He is under the impression that he did not take anything with him, except maybe his wallet.

He remembers that after it was known that Madeleine had disappeared he looked for her all over the apartment. He particularly remembers having looked under all the beds, inside the wardrobes in all the rooms at the same time that Kate told him she had looked everywhere.

When questioned if the twins woke while the apartment was being searched, he replies negatively. When they were taken to another apartment he does not know if they woke as he did not take them. When asked, he says that this was not normal, and can find no reason for it happening. He still thought at this moment that the twins might have been drugged by the possible abductor, even if he only mentioned this to the Police several days later.

When questioned, he states that from the first moment, after the first fruitless searches, he thought that Madeleine had been abducted and it was this information that he gave to everyone to whom he spoke. He reached such a conclusion because he did not think it possible that she had gone out on her own or opened the blinds and window in the room.

While the guests and employees of the resort were searching, he went to the main Reception to check whether they had called the Police, and told Kate to wait inside the apartment. After going to the Reception he went back to the apartment where he stayed in the living room and in their bedroom

When questioned he says that he did not request a priest, but to Kate to seek spiritual help.

When asked about the contents of the wardrobe in his room that can be seen in the photographs, he says that on top is a suitcase and below a pile of dirty clothes that he cannot make out. This wardrobe was opened to look for Madeleine.

When asked if in fact they went to the apartment every half hour, he says it is true, and that this was never created to justify absences during dinner.

After viewing the films and after the signalling of cadaver odour in their room next to the wardrobe and behind the sofa against the window in the living room, he says that he has no comments, neither has he any explanation for this fact.
Also, the dog that detects human blood signalled human blood behind the sofa mentioned above, he says that he cannot explain this fact.

Regarding the cadaver odour in the car that was rented at the end of May, (xx)-DA-27, he says he cannot explain more than what he already has.
Regarding the presence of human blood in the boot of the same vehicle, he says that he has not explanation for this fact.
When confronted with the fact that Madeleine's DNA was collected from behind the sofa and in the boot of the vehicle and analyzed by a British laboratory, situations also described before, he says that he cannot explain.

When asked if on any occasion Madeleine was injured, he says that he has no comments.

When asked if he has anything to add he says that he has not seen any proof that his daughter Madeleine is dead, and therefore he will continue to search for her in the hopes she is alive. He knows nothing more than what has been said.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-ARGUIDO.htm
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #888 on: April 05, 2015, 01:14:53 AM »
The guilty always lie to save themselves and that is the truth. When you know that lies are easy to spot because it connects to the truth. Saying nothing is your best option.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2015, 11:27:21 AM by Angelo222 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline sadie

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #889 on: April 06, 2015, 10:05:09 AM »
The guilty always lie to save themselves and that is the truth. When you know that lies are easy to spot because it connects to the truth. Saying nothing is your best option.
Oh Pathfinder, you are funny.

Would you like to outline the so- called- lies, please.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #890 on: April 06, 2015, 10:52:11 AM »
Oh Pathfinder, you are funny.

Would you like to outline the so- called- lies, please.

Read my theory.

"What we do now believe is that the abductor had very probably been into the room before Gerry’s check."

"The abductor would hardly have been expecting to see Jane walking towards him as he escaped, let alone have anticipated that Gerry would be standing talking round the corner."

The yard have gotten rid of Tannerman. They are after Smithman  8((()*/



Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline sadie

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #891 on: April 06, 2015, 09:44:23 PM »
Read my theory.

"What we do now believe is that the abductor had very probably been into the room before Gerry’s check."

"The abductor would hardly have been expecting to see Jane walking towards him as he escaped, let alone have anticipated that Gerry would be standing talking round the corner."

The yard have gotten rid of Tannerman. They are after Smithman  8((()*/

How do you make out that those are lies, Pfinder?

They are the thoughts and beliefs at that moment in time of one or both Mccanns, if they said them

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #892 on: April 06, 2015, 10:03:17 PM »
How do you make out that those are lies, Pfinder?

They are the thoughts and beliefs at that moment in time of one or both Mccanns, if they said them

Read my theory. It is based on facts connected to evidence (lies have been said). I'm saying the yard are on the right path.  Smithman was carrying Madeleine and his identity will have to be revealed if they want to solve it. The yard released the efits.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #893 on: April 06, 2015, 10:07:49 PM »
Read my theory.

"What we do now believe is that the abductor had very probably been into the room before Gerry’s check."

"The abductor would hardly have been expecting to see Jane walking towards him as he escaped, let alone have anticipated that Gerry would be standing talking round the corner."

The yard have gotten rid of Tannerman. They are after Smithman  8((()*/

We really do not have any idea who the PJ and the Yard may have eliminated from their inquiry nor do we know what individuals they are pursuing in Portugal ~ so we shall all just have to content ourselves and see what transpires.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #894 on: April 06, 2015, 10:16:26 PM »
Read my theory. It is based on facts connected to evidence (lies have been said). I'm saying the yard are on the right path.  Smithman was carrying Madeleine and his identity will have to be revealed if they want to solve it. The yard released the efits.

Where has it been categorically determined that the efits have been constructed from information given months after the event by the Smiths who could not provide a detailed description a fortnight after the event?

There are credible eye witnesses whose statements were not followed through to conclusion ... I think SY would have concentrated on those capable of supplying the required information as opposed to those on record, who could not.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #895 on: April 07, 2015, 12:10:49 AM »
Where has it been categorically determined that the efits have been constructed from information given months after the event by the Smiths who could not provide a detailed description a fortnight after the event?

There are credible eye witnesses whose statements were not followed through to conclusion ... I think SY would have concentrated on those capable of supplying the required information as opposed to those on record, who could not.

They would have investigated that sighting and connected it to the facts.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #896 on: April 07, 2015, 12:20:07 AM »
They would have investigated that sighting and connected it to the facts.

I'm sure they will have checked out all sightings and the descriptions witnesses were able to provide of facial features; that is something the Smiths were unable to provide when they made their statements a fortnight after the event,
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline misty

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #897 on: April 07, 2015, 12:22:33 AM »
They would have investigated that sighting and connected it to the facts.

It is therefore strange & confusing that the PJ did not investigate that sighting & connect it to the facts back in 2007. It's almost as though it was invisible.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #898 on: April 07, 2015, 12:53:23 AM »
I'm sure they will have checked out all sightings and the descriptions witnesses were able to provide of facial features; that is something the Smiths were unable to provide when they made their statements a fortnight after the event,

Perhaps they did that cognitive thing they did with Tanner with the Smiths  8(0(*
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #899 on: April 07, 2015, 01:00:02 AM »
It is therefore strange & confusing that the PJ did not investigate that sighting & connect it to the facts back in 2007. It's almost as though it was invisible.

It just seemed to fade into the background once Mr Smith had stated it definitely wasn't Robert Murat and only seemed to come back into the limelight when Mr Smith 'recognised' Dr Mccann.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....