How can a machine separate DNA when they don't know whose DNA it belongs to?
I've read a fair bit about true allele... And it isn't clear and that's why I suggested that Perlin answerred a few more questions people condemned SY.... It seems some are willing to believe anything without real evidence..
Thinking logically and from what is implied...
It's quite possible that the programme could come up with multiple possible profiles with some being note likely than others... And the computer, selects, the most likely..
I think it would struggle with a match to Maddue when both parents could have contributed to the mix..
So can Perlin answer the question... Was Maddie's DNA in the car... I think the answer is no.. He can give a probability but not a definitive answer... Then we ask what is, the significance when transference is highly likely...
I seem to remember from the podcast that Perlin said transference is unlikely... If he did he is wrong... I'll check again... Sutton certainly showed he didn't understand how likely transference was...which is a poor show for someone promoted by some as some kind if expert