I think in an interview such as this where someone has been convicted of such a horrendous crime there is a danger that recollections are coloured by what has just occurred....of attaching a sinister premise to an action or event that you wouldn’t have before the verdict and, unfortunately, no matter what approach the journalist took, with Luke’s conviction, the interview was never going to be balanced.
Yeah, fair enough. I agree, to an extent. I think the comments regarding Jodi being ‘a bit quiet’ that day were probably influenced by what she experienced at court and her exposure to the case in its entirety at the time. Believe the same is probably true for the ‘disturbed’ comment.
Btw, faithlilly, what is the one single, solitary piece of evidence from this case that makes you doubt Luke? I’ve read some posts of yours that put forward a case for Luke’s innocence, but is there one piece that makes you doubt this stance, doubt his innocence?