Author Topic: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.  (Read 70890 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #90 on: July 11, 2019, 10:20:06 PM »
Sandra Lean states here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg452488.html#msg452488
I didn't mean the actual call was still on Luke's phone - I should have made that clearer. The record of the call going to voicemail is in the phone logs, Corinne said in her statement that she was trying to call Luke to find out what was going on, but got his voicemail - the timings given in her statement and both her and Luke's phone records all matched up. My point was that the police deliberately lied about Luke "checking his voicemail" when the log is clearly labelled "incoming

This isn’t a deliberate lie it’s a lie of commission. I very much doubt they would have been interviewing him with their call logs on the table in front of them, and him.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Parky41

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #91 on: July 11, 2019, 11:11:04 PM »
These are the areas, when searching as to WHY? the police chose to fit up this laddie, for me fell flat. The constant supposition of pinning the blame from the onset. CM's claims of wanting him over the wall to leave his dna, Ms Leans that the police deleted the phone records, immediately upon taking his phone? Mainly though, the, I have all knowledge approach, I've seen it all. None of which can ever be fully backed up resulting in nothing being given a fair balance. Becomes tangled in multiple reasons behind different sources of misinformation. Basically, take your pick? believe or not.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #92 on: July 12, 2019, 12:25:47 PM »
These are the areas, when searching as to WHY? the police chose to fit up this laddie, for me fell flat. The constant supposition of pinning the blame from the onset. CM's claims of wanting him over the wall to leave his dna, Ms Leans that the police deleted the phone records, immediately upon taking his phone? Mainly though, the, I have all knowledge approach, I've seen it all. None of which can ever be fully backed up resulting in nothing being given a fair balance. Becomes tangled in multiple reasons behind different sources of misinformation. Basically, take your pick? believe or not.

It appears to me Sandra Lean is using the Luke Mitchell case as a mere means, just as she appears to have done in the Simon Hall case.

She is not concerned with how Luke Mitchell’s guilt will impact on and effect all those around him, she merely wants to use the case in a personal attempt to expose the CJS.

Sandra Lean states here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg452332.html#msg452332

I'm on record many, many times saying my search is for the truth. If that truth turns out to be that Luke Mitchell is guilty as charged, then so be it - the reason I do what I do is because we don't know for sure, because of all the unanswered questions. In my opinion, that's not justice and we should never accept it as such. It's not only Luke's case I say this about - it's every case I become involved with.

Maybe before writing her 2nd book and demanding answers of others in her alleged search for the truth it would have been an idea for her to explain to the rest of us (Also searching for the truth) how it came to be she made the decision to go into partnership with Billy Middleton (And at the time she did) and to tell us all where the charity monies ended up?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=442.0

She didn’t resign until April 2013.

From:​ S​andra Lean
Sent:​ Friday, April 05, 2013 5:37 PM To:​ ​Billy Middleton
Subject:​ WAP
Dear Billy,
Please accept this email as notification of my resignation as a director of the Wrongly Accused Person charity
I have been unwell for some time now, and the stress of worrying about ​the accounts situation, in particular​, is something I cannot cope with at the moment, so I feel it is best if I simply resign, and concentrate on regaining my health.
Kind regards Sandra

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=442.msg524659#msg524659

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/fury-as-dad-of-annalise-middleton-sets-1019199

http://www.mojuk.org.uk/WMAI/jointenterprisemark2.htm

Sandra Lean stated in January 2011:
Throughout my involvement with the Wrongly Accused and Convicted, I have acted with honesty, integrity and transparency, and that will continue to be the case. I have the truth on my side, and nothing can change that. I am aware that the attacks will continue, and I have neither the time, energy, nor inclination to continually refute them.

For almost 8 years, I have done what I have done voluntarily, and at my own expense. I ask for nothing in return – this was my choice, and continues to be my choice. For those who wish to see my reputation destroyed, or to have me go away, crushed by their incessant attacks, I have just one message – not a chance. Do your worst – you will not stop me from doing what I do. In the words of Dr Wayne Dyer, what you think of me is none of my business. If I bow to your opinion of me, I become your version of me. Why would I want to do that?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=8119.0
« Last Edit: July 12, 2019, 01:51:23 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

« Last Edit: July 12, 2019, 06:01:35 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Parky41

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #94 on: July 12, 2019, 06:44:16 PM »
https://matthewhamlenisinnocent.wordpress.com/

Quote
“The prosecution are fond of inferring that the defendant was at the scene of a crime, based on Cell Site Analysis. We are often able to show the court that the defendant could also have been in a number of other places, as the serving cell covered a large geographical area.”


Another area of misleading/misinformation. Ms Leans claims that the police did not try to trace where Lukes/anyones mobiles were being used from. Probably aware that 1) they were tested and or 2) in 2003, mobile tracking data was in its infancy. Covering an area from the defendants house to where it is believed he used his phone, would have been impossible to determine, other that the general area.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #95 on: July 12, 2019, 06:48:08 PM »
https://matthewhamlenisinnocent.wordpress.com/


Another area of misleading/misinformation. Ms Leans claims that the police did not try to trace where Lukes/anyones mobiles were being used from. Probably aware that 1) they were tested and or 2) in 2003, mobile tracking data was in its infancy. Covering an area from the defendants house to where it is believed he used his phone, would have been impossible to determine, other that the general area.

Yep
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation


Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #97 on: July 13, 2019, 02:40:33 PM »
These are the areas, when searching as to WHY? the police chose to fit up this laddie, for me fell flat. The constant supposition of pinning the blame from the onset. CM's claims of wanting him over the wall to leave his dna, Ms Leans that the police deleted the phone records, immediately upon taking his phone? Mainly though, the, I have all knowledge approach, I've seen it all. None of which can ever be fully backed up resulting in nothing being given a fair balance. Becomes tangled in multiple reasons behind different sources of misinformation. Basically, take your pick? believe or not.

During her podcast with JE Sandra Lean mentions “copycat murder”

Was “copycat murder” ever mentioned during Luke Mitchell trial?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Parky41

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #98 on: July 13, 2019, 03:45:26 PM »
Quote
During her podcast with JE Sandra Lean mentions “copycat murder”

Was “copycat murder” ever mentioned during Luke Mitchell trial?



Not that I am aware of? resemblance to which is not of the same strength of meaning as "copycat". to infer copycat, easier to dismantle evidence showing in retrospect of the the Manson dvd. IMO

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #99 on: July 13, 2019, 05:08:00 PM »


Not that I am aware of? resemblance to which is not of the same strength of meaning as "copycat". to infer copycat, easier to dismantle evidence showing in retrospect of the the Manson dvd. IMO

Neither am I

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #100 on: July 13, 2019, 07:02:42 PM »
https://matthewhamlenisinnocent.wordpress.com/


Another area of misleading/misinformation. Ms Leans claims that the police did not try to trace where Lukes/anyones mobiles were being used from. Probably aware that 1) they were tested and or 2) in 2003, mobile tracking data was in its infancy. Covering an area from the defendants house to where it is believed he used his phone, would have been impossible to determine, other that the general area.

According to Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jodi_Jones

“A full review of the case can be found in a recently published book titled ‘Innocents Betrayed’, written by criminologist Dr Sandra Lean who has already spearheaded some of the SCCRC appeals. The 350+ page book outlines numerous anomalies that were never presented before the Jury. Such anomalies today would likely raise eyebrows among Police officials, which brings into question the reliability and overall safety of the conviction of Luke Mitchell for this crime over a decade ago. Furthermore, a podcast with Dr Sandra Lean can now be found on YouTube where she discusses some of the anomalies, such as DNA profiles which were identified at the scene as being from different individuals (i.e, that of a used condom located near the deceased body of Jodi Jones). Between the podcast and the book, a full comprehensive overview of never seen before elements of this crime are now within the public domain.

At the bottom of the page it states: Last edited 21 days ago by Ginsburg5882

And here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ginsburg5882 is states: Ginsburg5882 Joined 24 days ago
« Last Edit: July 13, 2019, 07:09:04 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #101 on: July 13, 2019, 07:38:38 PM »
According to Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jodi_Jones

“A full review of the case can be found in a recently published book titled ‘Innocents Betrayed’, written by criminologist Dr Sandra Lean who has already spearheaded some of the SCCRC appeals. The 350+ page book outlines numerous anomalies that were never presented before the Jury. Such anomalies today would likely raise eyebrows among Police officials, which brings into question the reliability and overall safety of the conviction of Luke Mitchell for this crime over a decade ago. Furthermore, a podcast with Dr Sandra Lean can now be found on YouTube where she discusses some of the anomalies, such as DNA profiles which were identified at the scene as being from different individuals (i.e, that of a used condom located near the deceased body of Jodi Jones). Between the podcast and the book, a full comprehensive overview of never seen before elements of this crime are now within the public domain.

At the bottom of the page it states: Last edited 21 days ago by Ginsburg5882

And here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ginsburg5882 is states: Ginsburg5882 Joined 24 days ago

”over a decade ago” not 16 years ago

interesting
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #102 on: July 13, 2019, 08:00:56 PM »
According to Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jodi_Jones

A full review of the case can be found in a recently published book titled ‘Innocents Betrayed’, written by criminologist Dr Sandra Lean who has already spearheaded some of the SCCRC appeals. The 350+ page book outlines numerous anomalies that were never presented before the Jury. Such anomalies today would likely raise eyebrows among Police officials, which brings into question the reliability and overall safety of the conviction of Luke Mitchell for this crime over a decade ago. Furthermore, a podcast with Dr Sandra Lean can now be found on YouTube where she discusses some of the anomalies, such as DNA profiles which were identified at the scene as being from different individuals (i.e, that of a used condom located near the deceased body of Jodi Jones). Between the podcast and the book, a full comprehensive overview of never seen before elements of this crime are now within the public domain.

At the bottom of the page it states: Last edited 21 days ago by Ginsburg5882

And here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ginsburg5882 is states: Ginsburg5882 Joined 24 days ago

And the new book contains a “a full review of the case” then states “The 350+ page book outlines numerous anomalies that were never presented before the Jury”
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

« Last Edit: July 13, 2019, 08:21:38 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
« Reply #104 on: July 14, 2019, 11:55:16 PM »
There are so many lies being told in this case so thought it was worth pointing out about the family liaison officer.

She was appointed on 1 July 2003 and contacted the Mitchell family that evening.”
(157) https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

So the Mitchell’s or Luke had the whole of the following day to dispose of incriminating evidence.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation