Additional to the above post of mine... : .. Sorry to repeat a little ... But you will understand stand why by reading the post ...
The kitchen blind was broken and so stayed up all the time, as Greg Reardon had
confirmed.
It's biting is that statement.... It's nipping away at me.... It has got my goat!!!!!
It's ridiculous... Really we all need to think about that statement of 'The Defence".....(IMO)...
Dr Vincent Tabak has signed a statement in September as to what took place apparently on the evening of the 17th December 2010.....
If....and this is so "MASSIVELY" Important.... "The Defences" arguement for Dr Vincent Tabak managing to get contact with Joanna Yeates by waving at her throught the kitchen window.... Then "WHY" did "The Defence" need to clarify that the blind was broken... or even mention the blind ?????
Lets do logic.....
(A): Did The Defence Visit Flat 1 at Canygne Road before the trial......
Answer I doubt that very much.....
(B): Did the defence see pictures of a "BROKEN KiTCHEN BLIND" ???
Well if it's the picture of the blind that I have attached... there is NO evidence That this BLIND IS BROKEN.....
So.... Why would CLEGG even need to suggest to Greg Reardon that this Kitchen Blind was Broken and not merely left pulled up ?????
The Prosecution cannot 'Apparently"... Know the significance of this BLIND.... So CLEGG has to Bring this information to the courts attention.....
If the photographs and video that we know from the Juries visit show that the blind is "PULLED UP"... Then the idea that it was broken shouldn't come into play...... The Blind is
Innocuous.. The relevance of whether or not it was broken... really is pointless in a way....
If Joanna Yeates has just arrived home and the kitchen blind has been raised for instance... Maybe it was something she did every morning because of the lack of light at the side of the house...
If she was killed straight away as it has been suggested... she may not have gotten around to pulling the blind down....
But... they make a fuss over whether or NOT this BLIND is BROKEN.....
Again.... CLEGG... didn't need to ask if the blind was broken... It's raised....This is what evidence he would have seen and this is what evidence he should be happy with.....(IMO).... No need for "Clarification as to whether or not this "BLIND WAS BROKEN"...... So it's utterly Ridiculous that he uses the fact that GREG confirmed that this BLIND WAS BROKEN....
Who Mentioned the "BROKEN BLIND FIRST" and WHY Would you???
I can probaly tell you for why... I do remember a photograph from ages ago and I cant find it now... But I was sure that the blind hadn't been pulled up properly... And was dangling lower on one side... But we couldn't possibly have such a photo if Joanna Yeates Flat was a Time Capsule and hadn't been touched or entered until the Jury visit....
So did Clegg also see this photo of the Uneven kitchen BLIND???? Because quite honestly he had no GOOD Reason (IMO)... To Clarify that the KITCHEN BLIND WAS BROKEN If it bwas raied up high enough for Dr Vincent Tabak to see Joanna Yeates in her Kitchen.... (IMO)!!!!!!
http://www.criminal-lawyer.org.uk/39-CLN-JAN-2012.pdf