lets hope tonight's programme gives us more to go on. We always assume how people would act in certain settings but we dont even really know how we would react ourselves.
Right now there hasnt been anything that shouts out wrongly convicted but like you say mrswah who knows what will be shown tonight.
I will be watching with interest.
Today, after reviewing the case at London's Royal Courts of Justice, Mr Justice Pitchers ruled that the minimum jail "tariff" Razzell deserves for his crime is 16 years.
Even after time he spent on remand before his trial is taken into account, the judge's ruling means that Razzell cannot even apply for parole until late 2019.
The judge said the couple married in 1983 and had four children. However, Mrs Razzell confessed to her husband a brief affair she had had in 1999 and their marriage declined into bitterness.
Razzell, who worked for Allied Dunbar, himself began a new relationship and his wife launched divorce proceedings in 2000. He moved out soon afterwards, leaving her to look after their children.
As the rancorous divorce case ground on, Razzell was ordered to pay £650-a-month in child maintenance. He lost his job in 2001 and the battle ground between husband and wife moved on to his lump sum severance package, the whereabouts of which he refused to disclose.
In 2002, Mrs Razzell's solicitors obtained a freezing order against her husband's bank account and the judge said he must have realised that he was likely to lose his share of the matrimonial home and a proportion of his severance package.
Mr Justice Pitchers added: "This would have had a greater impact on him than on most men because the evidence in the case showed that he placed an exceptionally high importance on money and would have been extremely resentful that his wife seemed to be getting the better of him in this area".
Setting Razzell's minimum jail tariff at 16 years, the judge described him as an "obsessive planner" who had made careful notes of meetings and "a series of 'What if' flowcharts concerning the possible outcomes of his wife's disappearance".
The arrangement to swap cars for the day with a friend would have enabled him to approach his wife without arousing her suspicions.
Describing it as "a planned killing carried out in cold blood", the judge added: "His motive was partly money and partly anger that his wife was getting the better of him. The sums involved were not large, but they meant a great deal to him".
The murder had robbed Razzell's four children of their mother and the judge said: "He came across as an extremely unemotional man who looked first at the financial consequences of his actions".
Observing that there were "no mitigating features", the judge said that, were Razzell being sentenced for the first time today, under tougher guidelines now in force, he would have given him an 18-year minimum jail term.
Once Razzell has served his 16-year minimum term, he will still only be freed if he can persuade the Parole Board he poses no serious public danger. When, and if, released, he will remain on perpetual "life licence", subject to prison recall if he puts a foot wrong ever again
http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/2126047.Wife_murderer_will_serve_at_least_16_years/