Author Topic: “A Laughable Story”  (Read 71702 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #30 on: August 24, 2020, 12:24:18 PM »
Redwood said he believed maddie was abducted by a stranger based on the evidence...the open window is evidence of an intruder

HCW says he has evidence his suspect killed madeleine

Was there an open window because NOBODY ELSE SAW ONE?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #31 on: August 24, 2020, 12:35:49 PM »
Was there an open window because NOBODY ELSE SAW ONE?

According to kate yes...it seems the police beleive her...and strangely its how its said CB burgles properteis

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #32 on: August 24, 2020, 12:54:43 PM »
If my car is parked outside my house last thing at night and its gone in the morning is there any evidence of theft.

 

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #33 on: August 24, 2020, 01:08:11 PM »
If my car is parked outside my house last thing at night and its gone in the morning is there any evidence of theft.

 is there any evidence of theft.


Well obviously yes...the car has gone...clue being no car.

Offline Lace

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #34 on: August 24, 2020, 01:09:09 PM »
By many people including several former detectives. There isn't a shred of evidence to support Madeleine McCann being abducted from her bed.

Strange how Police forces have come to the conclusion that she was.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #35 on: August 24, 2020, 01:09:18 PM »

 is there any evidence of theft.


Well obviously yes...the car has gone...clue being no car.

precisely...well done

Offline Lace

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #36 on: August 24, 2020, 01:11:35 PM »
What doesn’t make sense is

a) Why leave the twins alone and vulnerable after finding her child gone ?
b) Why did the ‘leaning out of the window’ tale appear only 4 years after the event in Kate’s book ? No mention of it in her statement.

Kate had searched the apartment,  the abductor had gone and wouldn't be hanging about either.    What questions were Kate asked in her interviews?   she may have just said searched the apartment.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #37 on: August 24, 2020, 01:25:31 PM »
It was Amaral's job to investigate Madeleine's disappearance and to gather evidence. The actions of the McCanns and their friends and family definitely hampered the investigation imo.
Hampered it in what way?  Please give specific examples.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #38 on: August 24, 2020, 01:26:58 PM »
You are definitely in denial. The tracker dogs fortunately tell a different tale.
No you are in denial, and in the thrall of the dogs.  How come you believe the tracker dogs but dismiss the cadaver dogs?  Icidentally how do the tracker dogs prove that Madeleine was not abducted from the apartment?
« Last Edit: August 24, 2020, 01:30:47 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #39 on: August 24, 2020, 01:27:58 PM »
For starters, no truly innocent parent of a missing child refuses to answer dozens of simple police questions. Such a parent would be pro active and fully assist the police but this didn't happen here!

Who or what was Kate McCann scared of?
Easy - The PJ and of being fitted up.  Next question?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #40 on: August 24, 2020, 01:28:35 PM »
Was there an open window because NOBODY ELSE SAW ONE?
Yes they did - check out the witness statements again.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline misty

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #41 on: August 24, 2020, 01:31:29 PM »
For starters, no truly innocent parent of a missing child refuses to answer dozens of simple police questions. Such a parent would be pro active and fully assist the police but this didn't happen here!

Who or what was Kate McCann scared of?

Here's the online advice which somewhat mirrors the action Kate took:-

Offline misty

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #42 on: August 24, 2020, 01:42:51 PM »
What doesn’t make sense is

a) Why leave the twins alone and vulnerable after finding her child gone ?
b) Why did the ‘leaning out of the window’ tale appear only 4 years after the event in Kate’s book ? No mention of it in her statement.

Here's the demonstration of how the children's window opened in 5A contained in GA's documentary TToTL. The position of Kate's fingerprints on the r/h edge of the r/h frame were consistent with her leaning out the window, not opening it.
https://youtu.be/x_ZdDTsFC2g?t=2753

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #43 on: August 24, 2020, 01:43:46 PM »
For starters, no truly innocent parent of a missing child refuses to answer dozens of simple police questions. Such a parent would be pro active and fully assist the police but this didn't happen here!

Who or what was Kate McCann scared of?

Scared of beeing fitted up by an inept police force who didnt understand the evidence...whose co ordinator had alraedy acted illegally in another investigation

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #44 on: August 24, 2020, 01:48:44 PM »
According to at least one member of this forum the McCanns “abduction story” is laughable. 

So what exactly is the abduction story told by the McCanns, which bits make forum members laugh and why?

We all know some find the jemmied shutters rather hilarious but that is just a semantics game played by certain members objecting to the word “jemmied” which may or may not have been uttered by Gerry.  Whether he meant actually jemmied with a crow bar or force opened by some other means is really a boring argument that seems pointless to repeat for the umpteenth time - the gist though is that the McCanns said someone else opened the shutters and window.

Does this make forum members laugh and if so please explain why it tickles you so.

Also anything else that gets you giggling about the “abduction story” as told by the McCanns, please share your views here.

Think you have twisted things a bit here ...the abduction laughable  .. as in its a joke.


meaning

What is the word for not telling the whole truth?
While the noun prevarication is mostly just a fancy way to say "lie," it can also mean skirting around the truth, being vague about the truth, or even delaying giving someone an answer, especially to avoid telling them the whole truth.

The no evidence whatsoever...apart from the mccs saying so abduction ..is a joke IMO