I Was a Paid Internet Shill

[Jean-Pierre]

absolutely nothing

awfully quiet, innit. 

[ferryman]

absolutely nothing

Kate was on dodgy ground on one point. 

She told Leverson no bodily fluids had been found in the Renault.

She lamentably failed to tell them about the spots of Gerry's blood on the ignition key ....

[stephen25000]

another ridiculous post....you have no evidence anyone is being paid...it is another delusion

Where did I say paid in my last post ?

[Mr Gray]

Where did I say paid in my last post ?

you are making things up re levenson

[stephen25000]

you are making things up re levenson

Nope.

It is in the records.

[Jean-Pierre]

Nope.

It is in the records.

Where?  Perhaps you would, as per the rules of this forum, provide a cite to back up your comment, or delete it.

Your choice.

[stephen25000]

Where?  Perhaps you would, as per the rules of this forum, provide a cite to back up your comment, or delete it.

Your choice.

The mccanns have people 'monitoring' the internet.

Now 'monitoring' in this context can imply many things.


 

[Brietta]

Nope.

It is in the records.

Then it will be no problem at all for you to provide a quotation ...   ...

Have no fear.

Part of the learning curve is that you never supply a cite in support of any of the preposterous allegations you come up with.

Makes your posts not only tiresome ... but totally meaningless to boot,

Without exception all other posters supply cites when asked.  Why do you consider yourself exempt?

[Jean-Pierre]

Then it will be no problem at all for you to provide a quotation ...   ...

Have no fear.

Part of the learning curve is that you never supply a cite in support of any of the preposterous allegations you come up with.

Makes your posts not only tiresome ... but totally meaningless to boot,

Without exception all other posters supply cites when asked.  Why do you consider yourself exempt?

Of course Stephen is exempt from the rules us lesser mortals abide by.

It is reasonable, IMO. 

After all, how can one supply a cite to verbal ectoplasm?

[stephen25000]

Of course Stephen is exempt from the rules us lesser mortals abide by.

It is reasonable, IMO. 

After all, how can one supply a cite to verbal ectoplasm?

Is that an example of the mccann supporters attacking the sceptic mantra, JP ?

Or are you trying to incite posters to abusive responses ? &%+((£

[Jean-Pierre]

You really must not lie Brietta.

I do give Cites.

Unlike some I could mention who cite without comprehension.

Well come on then Stephen.  Lets see a cite to the McCanns submisison to the leverson committee

To remind you:


Quote from: Jean-Pierre on Today at 02:25:52 PM

    It is interesting how this topic crops up from time to time on various fora connected with this case.

    Invariably directed at those who support the McCanns .

    Usually on the lines of "I think the McCanns are guilty of (insert crime du jour).  As you don't agree with me then you must be being paid by someone to "disrupt".

 
Stephen25000

Now what did the mccanns reveal at the Leverson Inquiry jp ?



 

[Mr Gray]

The mccanns have people 'monitoring' the internet.

Now 'monitoring' in this context can imply many things.

as I said...monitoring the net...nothing more

[Alice Purjorick]

LBTR

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id385.html