Author Topic: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?  (Read 102250 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« on: November 10, 2015, 03:43:48 PM »
This is a topic which has intrigued since Redwood had his 'revelation moment'.

Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?

Tannerman was the name given to the man seen by Jane Tanner at about 9.15pm on the evening that Madeleine McCann disappeared.  This man walked across the road in front of her and was carrying a young child laid across his arms.  The artist iimpression depicted below (right image) was created by Portuguese police following interviews with Mss Tanner.



'Revelation moment': Police revealed a major breakthrough when a British father (left image) came forward to reveal he was the man who for six years had been considered the prime suspect in the Madeleine McCann case

During a live BBC Crimewatch presentation, Met officer DCI Andy Redwood who was leading the investigation into the disappearance revealed confirmed it had ruled out the man previously seen near the McCanns’ Portuguese apartment.

"A British father considered the prime suspect in the Madeleine McCann kidnapping for six years blew open the case after coming forward to police with his child's distinctive frilly pyjamas.

The mystery man's involvement was ruled out after detectives realised he was taking his own two-year-old daughter home from a crèche and had not snatched Maddie.

He even agreed to be pictured in the clothes he wore in Praia da Luz, on May 3, 2007, to prove he was the man in the police sketch previously seen as key to cracking the case.

His two-year-old's pink pyjamas, which were described by one of the McCann's closest friends, were also brought to Scotland Yard to help prove his innocence."




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2460669/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapping-innocent-British-father-mistaken-key-suspect.html#ixzz3rC6f5rTx

107
« Last Edit: November 12, 2015, 01:05:03 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Brietta

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2015, 10:52:02 PM »
If the Met could trace this man years down the line and eliminate him from the inquiry ... why wasn't he found in 2007 by the original investigators?
« Last Edit: November 11, 2015, 02:01:31 PM by John »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2015, 10:57:54 PM »
If the Met could trace this man years down the line and eliminate him from the inquiry ... why wasn't he found in 2007 by the original investigators?

How do YOU know he wasn't ? The original investigation didn't swallow the story why was that I wonder?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2015, 10:59:39 PM »
How do YOU know he wasn't ? The original investigation didn't swallow the story why was that I wonder?
why is there no record of this man in the files then?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2015, 11:07:08 PM »
why is there no record of this man in the files then?

He never made a statement?
He made a statement in the UK and it wasn't passed on?
The PJ saw his statement saying he collected his child and walked 'near' G5A, but they looked at the location of the night creche and the location of his apartment and decided he wasn't going to be walking where Tanner saw him?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2015, 11:16:18 PM »
He never made a statement?
He made a statement in the UK and it wasn't passed on?
The PJ saw his statement saying he collected his child and walked 'near' G5A, but they looked at the location of the night creche and the location of his apartment and decided he wasn't going to be walking where Tanner saw him?
So you thinking it's perfectly possible that the PJ found this individual, investigated him and discarded him as a suspect all without mentioning him in the files, nor any mention of having found him in Amaral's book?  OK, if you want to think that, that's absolutely fine.,... &%+((£

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2015, 11:18:11 PM »
He never made a statement?
He made a statement in the UK and it wasn't passed on?
The PJ saw his statement saying he collected his child and walked 'near' G5A, but they looked at the location of the night creche and the location of his apartment and decided he wasn't going to be walking where Tanner saw him?

I go for number 2.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2015, 11:23:30 PM »
I go for number 2.
If he'd already been found and dismissed then why did it take until 2013 for Andy Redwood's "revelation moment"?.  I know you all think he's a bit slow on the uptake but that's ridiculous!

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2015, 11:26:57 PM »
So you thinking it's perfectly possible that the PJ found this individual, investigated him and discarded him as a suspect all without mentioning him in the files, nor any mention of having found him in Amaral's book?  OK, if you want to think that, that's absolutely fine.,... &%+((£

If he responded to 'Crimestoppers' that information was kept secret at UK request.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2015, 11:30:45 PM »
If he'd already been found and dismissed then why did it take until 2013 for Andy Redwood's "revelation moment"?.  I know you all think he's a bit slow on the uptake but that's ridiculous!

Why do think it is a simple task? A significant task if you have access to the information, impossible if you don't know the information exists.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2015, 11:38:27 PM »
If he'd already been found and dismissed then why did it take until 2013 for Andy Redwood's "revelation moment"?.  I know you all think he's a bit slow on the uptake but that's ridiculous!

There was a lot of rubbish information to review, so it would take time. Or;

Redwood didn't understand the layout of the ocean Club and didn't realise the bloke had followed a very strange route?

Redwood did know the layout of the Ocean Club but was determined to get rid of the Tanner sighting because he preferred the Smith sighting?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2015, 11:42:41 PM »
Jane Tanner's sighting appears to have been ignored by the initial investigation.

Martin Smith's sighting appears to have been ignored until his totally erroneous revelation moment.

Is this an example of disregarding what evidence there was to follow the theory preferred by Mr Amaral?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2015, 11:44:30 PM »
Why do think it is a simple task? A significant task if you have access to the information, impossible if you don't know the information exists.

Did no-one think to check out the night crèche register ... elementary my dear Watson ...
« Last Edit: November 11, 2015, 01:39:00 PM by John »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2015, 07:48:32 AM »
Did no-one think to check out the night crèche register ... elementary my dear Watson ...

Except anyone coming from he night crèche would tend to be going in the opposite direction to the JT statement.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why was Tannerman going the wrong way?
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2015, 08:12:33 AM »
Except anyone coming from he night crèche would tend to be going in the opposite direction to the JT statement.
A thorough, open minded policeman would not make assumptions like that and not bother checking, don't you agree?