http://www.policek9.com/Fleck/Cadaver%20Dogs.pdf*snipped*
People v King (04 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8280 Court of Appeal California,
Fourth Appellate District, Division One, 2004)
The dog scent evidence was admissible, due to the fact that the dog was trained,
certified and reliable:
• The dog's handler was qualified by training and experience to use the
dog;
• The dog was adequately trained in distinguishing the odor of human
cadaver scent;
• The dog has been found to be reliable in alerting on an area where a
human cadaver scent has existed;
• The vehicle line-up wherein defendant's vehicle was placed and wherein
the canine, Scout, and his handler participated was properly and fairly
conducted;
•
The defendant's vehicle and the scent within had not become stale or
contaminated at the time of the line-up. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The last 2 conditions for canine evidence to be permitted in a US court case could be applicable when judging the validity of Eddie's alerts.