The car searches in the Maddie case.

[stephen25000]

Did Martin Grime keep COMMANDING Eddie back with a loud voice and very loud raps?   .... or did he not?


Did Martin Grime command Eddie back to any other cars?   ..... or did he not ?


Sorry, stephen.
Martin may not have realsed it, but in my book that is biased and unfair.   That is my opinion and I think most people would agree.

I ask you again Sadie.

Have you witnessed forensic dogs, or for that matter any other dogs employed in searched, first-hand ?

Watching a video, is no substitute.

[sadie]

I ask you again Sadie.

Have you witnessed forensic dogs, or for that matter any other dogs employed in searched, first-hand ?

Watching a video, is no substitute.

The video showed exactly what happened. 

Eddie was COMMANDED back VERY STERNLY 4 or 5 times to one car only ... and that was the Mccann hire car.  Why weren't the other cars given the same treatment?

Do you want me to post it again, cos I cant at the moment.

 

[stephen25000]

The video showed exactly what happened. 

Eddie was COMMANDED back VERY STERNLY 4 or 5 times to one car only ... and that was the Mccann hire car.  Why weren't the other cars given the same treatment?

Do you want me to post it again, cos I cant at the moment.

As I thought, your observations are solely based from watching a video.

[Eleanor]

As I thought, your observations are solely based from watching a video.

As are those of everyone else.

[stephen25000]

As are those of everyone else.

....and the video only shows part of what happened.#

No substitution for direct observation of deployment.

[Eleanor]

....and the video only shows part of what happened.#

No substitution for direct observation of deployment.

Because Levy edited the videos.  Why did he do that, I wonder?

[John]

The bit we all have to remember is what went on when the camera was not recording and that applies to all the searches. How much playing to camera went on?

[Lace]

As I thought, your observations are solely based from watching a video.

So are yours aren't they?

I agree with Sadie,   when it came to the cars as with the other apartments,  Eddie was called back numerous times.

[ShiningInLuz]

You need to amend your post now

Why?  It was commented on by more than one poster.

I have a fair degree of fun trying to work out some of your phone bloopers.  In the main, I can grasp the meaning.

But I have to say that one stumped me, as apparently it did Stephen and others.

[misty]

SM's Audi was searched inside at some stage as some forensics were obtained.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PORTUGUESE-FORENSIC.htm
With respect to Vehicle Audi A4 10-91-PF:

- 1 labelled envelope with delivery note no. 420C/2007-CR/L:
Vestigio:
Vg1 - "Sundry head-hair collected from the front seat, right side"- 3 hairs.

Somewhere in the files I remember seeing some pictures of the seats in his Audi but I'll have to locate them to clarify that.

[ShiningInLuz]

SM's Audi was searched inside at some stage as some forensics were obtained.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PORTUGUESE-FORENSIC.htm
With respect to Vehicle Audi A4 10-91-PF:

- 1 labelled envelope with delivery note no. 420C/2007-CR/L:
Vestigio:
Vg1 - "Sundry head-hair collected from the front seat, right side"- 3 hairs.

Somewhere in the files I remember seeing some pictures of the seats in his Audi but I'll have to locate them to clarify that.

I believe his Audi was in the 10 car dog search.

Front seat, right side suggests a passenger.  But if he used it for work, it could be any one of many people.