Author Topic: The Defence Will State Their Case  (Read 599757 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1800 on: September 28, 2018, 05:03:33 PM »
Dont you still not realise what they were doing when they said all that Nine? they were making the best out of a very grim situation to actually work in his favour

Yes they could hardly say what a nice guy he was after killing her and dumping her body. The injuries she had were also not in keeping with what he alleged... i.e. that he did not mean her harm...

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1801 on: September 28, 2018, 05:07:05 PM »
@)(++(*   How do you work that one out??

The defence wanted the jury on their side. He pleaded guilty...the defence had to appear as the good guy saying yes he is this and this and this BUT... he didnt mean it. All games

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1802 on: September 28, 2018, 05:07:22 PM »
@)(++(*   How do you work that one out??

Because Nine what his defence team did was say to the jury, ok he is not a very nice person, he has admitted killing her and dumping her body, but we (his defence) say he still did not intend to kill...

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1803 on: September 28, 2018, 05:11:06 PM »
had to check you werent behind my sofa then  @)(++(*


Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1805 on: September 28, 2018, 05:20:07 PM »
had to check you werent behind my sofa then  @)(++(*

OMG... I'm a dim wit.... "Mouse!! " behind sofa....   

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1806 on: September 28, 2018, 05:20:51 PM »
Anyway.. I am bored of this game... We agree to disagree...  Simples!!

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1807 on: September 28, 2018, 05:39:25 PM »
had to check you werent behind my sofa then  @)(++(*

Would have gotten a shock if I was  @)(++(*

 (ty6e[

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1808 on: September 28, 2018, 05:49:40 PM »
You wouldnt have lasted long... i was singing!

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1809 on: September 28, 2018, 06:28:22 PM »
OMG... I'm a dim wit.... "Mouse!! " behind sofa....

no lol just we posted almost the exact same thing at the same time. thought they were peeping  @)(++(*

Offline John

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1810 on: September 28, 2018, 09:53:40 PM »
Posters are again reminded to keep to the topic under discussion and please refrain from making derogative comments towards other members.  TY
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1811 on: September 29, 2018, 07:48:42 AM »
When looking at 192.com It has Dr Vincent Tabak's age being 40-44

First I didn't take much notice, as the years have passed...  Just thought it was correct, but I remembered I'd seen something on twitter... and on the 20th January 2011 a tweet was posted..

Quote
Josie Ensor

Verified account
 
@Josiensor
Follow Follow @Josiensor
More
Although, according to 192 search of 2010 electoral role, Vincent Tabak is the 40-44 age band? http://bit.ly/ehNfCK #joyeates

3:01 PM - 20 Jan 2011
And...

Quote
Liz Church

 
@dailyturnout
 20 Jan 2011
More
http://twitpic.com/3rqksc - @SkyNews Vincent Tabak age 40-44 according to electoral roll

Quote

Liz Church

 
@dailyturnout
 20 Jan 2011
More
@antonvowl @MinorityThought @press_not_sorry Vincent Tabak aged 40-44 according to my info #JoannaYeates


So how old is Dr Vincent Tabak?? 

If I remember correctly he was born 10th Feb 1978 ... making him 40 now

It appears that the 192.com age hasn't changed... Which is not a problem,

But how do you account for the age?

This is why I ask questions like was it an undercover operation, It is almost like an identity was pre made...  I could be wrong of course, but how else would you explain it?

Edit... We have a man at trial who identity has not been verified as far as I am aware and who's age is questionable..

Surely someone needs to verify these things.. If Dr Vincent Tabak confirmed his age at the time as being 32/33 then that cannot be correct... Did no-one check anything?




https://twitter.com/Josiensor/status/28104792735744000
https://twitter.com/dailyturnout/status/28101010517917696
https://twitter.com/dailyturnout/status/28093282235977728

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1812 on: September 29, 2018, 08:10:10 AM »
 *%87
« Last Edit: September 29, 2018, 08:14:56 AM by jixy »

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1813 on: September 29, 2018, 08:10:46 AM »
I understand how strange that would look .... so i just tested the theory.

I checked my friend and the date showing is 2002-2003 with an age range of 27-31

15 years ago

They are only 35 now so a huge difference in the age shown to actual age


jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #1814 on: September 29, 2018, 08:11:58 AM »
check it out with details you know to be true