I posted a while ago an image that showed the intercom outside Joanna Yeates Flat and where was written upon it Flat 1, It had taken me a while stopping and starting a clip to be able to freeze frame the intercom and capture, the image...
I had struggled to find a close up image of Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat intercom.... well one that got close up enough to show us the number of the flat...
I have many times stated that I believed that the basement was connected, I got excited when I found the forensic team doing forensics on the bay window in December 2010, wondering if the flat could have been shared or if the Flat was Dr Vincent Tabak's why were they seeing him as a suspect so early on..... why were they working on the Flat we know as his....
All this time I have argued about this case, all this time I have tried to unravel what is wrong and what is staged, all this time I have tried to find something that could be a key to the mystery that is somewhere around the internet contradicting the narrative we have been told....
And at last I believe I have found it.....
A clip, that show the scaffolding being erected, when I screenshot the news footage I captured a close up of the intercom panel that was outside Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat..... Or should I rephrase that...
The Flat we have been lead to believe that Dr Vincent Tabak lived in... The Flat at the back of the building with the wooden framed door with glass panels.... The Flat where we have been lead to believe that Dr Vincent Tabak carried Joanna Yeates from her Flat at the side of the building, around to his Flat at the back, with no-one being or witnessing this event taking place...
A Flat were a jury visited, a flat were the media filmed... A Flat that I am being to wonder if it ever existed.... How can a man be arrested for murder and sentenced based on evidence that is incorrect... How can a jury have been allowed to believe that this flat at the back of the building is Vincent Tabak's Flat?
How is it possible, to commit a crime from a none existing Flat?
Flat 2 was depicted in 'The Lost Honour of CJ.' we remember a man portraying CJ go to Flat 2 and a man portraying Dr Vincent Tabak opening the door, CJ is asking for assistance, he has Greg in tow.... CJ is looking for jump leads...
There is also a video where CJ describes that Dr Vincent Tabak lived in a Flat at the back of the building and Joanna Yeates Flat and Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat both had their own entrances...
We have the article that Liz Lowman describes people leaving the communal Flat and until now I had no proof that it was even possible to show that the basement Flat was just that..... communal...
But to my surprise today, I came across a clip , that reveals just that.... A clip that clearly shows the intercom panel on the left hand side of the door we have been told is Flat 2 and finally managed to secure an images of this intercom panel... This intercom panel revealing to us that the Flat we have been lead to believe is Flat 2 isn't... The Flat we have been lead to believe is independent and separate from Joanna Yeates who lived at Flat 1 isn't...
The intercom panel clearly shows us that The Flat we know as Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat has the Flat number of
Flat 1.... This is incredible, the implications of this info casts doubts on many things... The implications and the story that was told on the stand by Dr Vincent Tabak... A story that we know is a lie....
But why have the media gone with this... They clearly would have seen that the basement Flat was indeed just one Flat... They clearly walked around the entire ground floor outside...
So which Flat did Dr Vincent Tabak live in?? How did he apparently walk out of the Flat t with the glass panelled door to the side of the building to the Flat with the solid door, to pass a kitchen window, where apparently Joanna Yeates and Dr Vincent Tabak first set eyes upon each other that evening , and with a nod, waved and was invited in....
A huge pack of lies on the stand, by a man who couldn't remember so many details... by a man who struggled to answer the questions posed to him by The Prosecution...
Well how bad was his memory.... It must have been shocking if he didn't know the difference between a basement Flat and one in the main building....
I had also some time ago an image of a man I believed to be possibily Dr Vincent Tabak entering or should I say returning to Canygne Road and entering the main entrance, there were a couple of woman I think waiting for him outside the main entrance.... I suggested that it might have been Dr Vincent Tabak going to Canygne Road to collect some belongings, before he moved to Aberdeen Road...
Does the fact that Flat 2 is really one basement Flat now clear up the image of the man I posted?? Was it in fact Dr Vincent Tabak returning to collect some belongings??
Therefore if Dr Vincent Tabak actually lived in the main building, how would he seriously be able to move a body into said main building without any other tenants noticing??
I had said I believed that the Red Book case ,shelving unit hide a doorway to the other flat.. I believed that the sensor that sat at the top of this shelving unit indicated a door way...
I have stated many many times that Joanna Yeates Flat had been staged, and I know believe that the proof that both intercoms of the basements flat, show us this is the case... I believe that both intercoms show is that the Flat is indeed one Flat and not two...
That has now opened up a whole different ball game, that has now opened up a whole can of worms...
Isn't it time that the truth was really known, isn't it time that we are told what really happened to Joanna Yeates.. isn't it time the real killer was revealed??
Was the Flat shared?? I don't know or did Dr Vincent Tabak actually live in a different part of the building....
Maybe the Ikea mens testimony could be needed, they may be able to shed light on which entrance they delivered the furniture too....
Liz Lowman, who lives on the opposite side of the road, said Mr Jefferies told her the three people were coming out of a shared entrance to the house.
“These people were leaving through the communal entrance,” she said. “Unfortunately, we didn’t hear or see anything.
“I don’t think there was a party that night as I would have heard the music and we heard nothing and we were in all evening.
Do we also ask for Liz Lowmans testimony, seeing as it was she who explained that the flat was communal, and had a communal entrance, or is that 2 entrances??
Again the forum is stating that my attachments couldn't be saved, again I have not the ability to put up the proof that the intercom panel that is next to the door of Dr Vincent Tabak's apparent Flat is indeed stating that this Flat is in fact FLAT1... I do not understand why this is happening... Could someone please clarify why i am having this problem?? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8230708/Joanna-Yeates-was-with-two-people-her-landlord-tells-police.html
