What do you think of the content of Tabak's porn searches? I'll keep asking! Why wouldn't you answer this question, it's simple enough! Where do YOU stand on people searching out violent porn images and video's?
Why do you keep asking about where I stand on that subject... Why is it relevant...??
The content of the porn searches has been described in many ways, and as the porn wasn't seen as relevant at trial, it cannot have been illegal..
The series mentioned by the media was a series of Porn called 'Sex and Submission".. which I posted about long ago and was a pay to view series on the adult channel I believe...
So whether or not I have an opinion on porn, isn't relevant to a Murder that a man went to trial for...
Or is that the point.... Was it supposed to sway the jury even more??
Edit... In England the jury are made up of a variety of people from all faiths and back grounds, If you are on the electoral role, you can be called at any time, I believe....
We do not have a system like they do in America, when they know about each juror and what maybe they may vote like, where they appear, I glean, to pick and chooses which Juror they want to keep... ( I do not know this as fact.. I state I glean this)
In England once you are picked as a juror, that is it, there needs to be a bloody good reason why you cannot be on a particular jury... Otherwise, it's whoever is in court at that time...
So you may end up with a jury of 12 people whom are NOT religious... So it wouldn't really be a morality issue, if it could be seen as a morality issue..
So maybe you cannot apply the same tactics in an English court room that you could apply in an American court room..
