Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 1480643 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8460 on: August 07, 2020, 08:05:34 PM »
Holly for one.

OMG really? where is the post. I am shocked.

I know she likes justice and all but to want that monster to get compo  ewwwwww

just the one name- maybe you should amend you post for accuracy.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8461 on: August 07, 2020, 08:11:16 PM »
OMG really? where is the post. I am shocked.

I know she likes justice and all but to want that monster to get compo  ewwwwww

just the one name- maybe you should amend you post for accuracy.

Try reading back a bit on the main Threads.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8462 on: August 07, 2020, 08:13:29 PM »
OMG really? where is the post. I am shocked.

I know she likes justice and all but to want that monster to get compo  ewwwwww

just the one name- maybe you should amend you post for accuracy.
Wonderfulspam was another.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8463 on: August 07, 2020, 08:23:48 PM »
Wonderfulspam was another.

lol spammer is a given for  troll posts.

But thanks anyway.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8464 on: August 07, 2020, 08:32:35 PM »
lol spammer is a given for  troll posts.

But thanks anyway.
Then there was this from Faithlily to Davel

“Then you are okay with Brueckner receiving huge wads of cash for the unsubstantiated allegations made about him in the press. Glad to hear it.”

"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8465 on: August 07, 2020, 08:33:27 PM »
There is some uncertainty about this- the lady in question was in a relationship with the Tory MP, She didn't report to the police. The claims are about when she was in  a 'toxic' type relationship with him. It certainly does need looked into!

However, it isn't quite on the same tablet as accessing  babies in porn...suspended sentence? WTF! Not even on the sex register. I wonder who he knows and shares his 'hobby' with.

 But I would guess the hanging brigade are out in force demanding all sorts for the Tory MP before it has been properly investigated!

The lady in question did report the incident to the police as Mark Spencer wasn’t doing anything. Why do you think there is a police investigation going on ?

You don’t need to ‘know’ anyone to get a suspended sentence for a child abuse conviction....remember Nigel Nessling ?

The investigation should of course run its course but in any other industry if a employee in a senior position had been accused of sexual assault he or she would be suspended to the investigation was completed.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8466 on: August 07, 2020, 08:36:40 PM »
OMG really? where is the post. I am shocked.

I know she likes justice and all but to want that monster to get compo  ewwwwww

just the one name- maybe you should amend you post for accuracy.

No one wants Brueckner to get any money but several of us think it’s a possibility if he isn’t charged in connection with Madeleine’s disappearance he will sue the newspapers who suggested he was...much like the parents.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8467 on: August 07, 2020, 08:44:02 PM »
No one wants Brueckner to get any money but several of us think it’s a possibility if he isn’t charged in connection with Madeleine’s disappearance he will sue the newspapers who suggested he was...much like the parents.

How much did Michael Barrymore get..I think you are living in cloud cuckoo land


Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8468 on: August 07, 2020, 08:48:42 PM »
How much did Michael Barrymore get..I think you are living in cloud cuckoo land

We shall wait and see.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8469 on: August 07, 2020, 08:51:40 PM »
We shall wait and see.

I think that's the most sensible post you've ever made

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8470 on: August 07, 2020, 09:02:49 PM »
I think that's the most sensible post you've ever made

I think I’ll grow old waiting for yours.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8471 on: August 07, 2020, 09:06:11 PM »
I think I’ll grow old waiting for yours.
I doubt you will ever see sense...however old you get
I have absolute proof of that

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8472 on: August 07, 2020, 09:59:42 PM »
I doubt you will ever see sense...however old you get
I have absolute proof of that

In your posts...absolutely.

Or is that ‘faulty logic ‘  @)(++(*
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8473 on: August 07, 2020, 10:03:51 PM »
In your posts...absolutely.

Or is that ‘faulty logic ‘  @)(++(*

I have absolute proof that you have  a very poor interpretation of evidence

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #8474 on: August 08, 2020, 12:07:51 AM »
I have absolute proof that you have  a very poor interpretation of evidence
Prove that or expect more moderation.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.