Yes, I wondered about that - they keep going on about how there was no evidence but suddenly there is enough to point to Sheila? Her evidence is base on 'Sheila's mental health' which is circumstantial and yet circumstantial isn't good enough for Jeremy? She said sometimes the simplest explanation is the best one - yep, I agree - Jeremy is guilty, simple! She picks the most ridiculous theory and suggests that's what people believe, all the prosecution had to do was show that he could get to and from WHF in pretty good time and they did that. Personally I think he went on foot, he knew the area well and would have known all the short cuts and how to stay off the main road. Again - simple!
They also ignore plenty of red flags.
Jeremy saying he called police immediately when in fact he called Julie before police is a red flag. Someone actually receiving the call he claims to have received either would rush over or call police then rush over.
Jeremy taking the time to look up phone numbers of police stations instead of calling 999 is a red flag. He initially said he called Witham and got no response which corresponds with police no police being at Witham to answer- something he could only know if he actually called as claimed. Despite getting no answer and all stations might have the phones unmanned at such hour he then looked up another station instead of deciding to call 999.
He only went there because police wanted him to go though someone in his place would want to go on their own. To try to deal with this problem many supporters lie and say police told him to wait for them though they said no such thing. They told him to go there and meet the police they sent to fill such police in directly. He had no plans to go there otherwise.
Someone there would be trying to get police to do something or try to go in themselves. Not Jeremy instead he discouraged police from entering by telling lies about Sheila being able to use every weapon in the house and describing an arsenal. He also told police she would not be happy to see him because they didn't like one another so she might be even more apt to shoot if she saw him. So police were dissuaded from trying to use Jeremy to help get inside.
They ignore the red flag of the gun having had the scope removed which there was no reason to do ever. It didn't need to be removed to clean it even. The barrel could be removed while the scope was left in place. The only reason to remove it is if one intends to use it in close quarters combat.
They ignore that Jeremy was not in the habit of shooting rabbits and that his tale of getting the gun to shoot rabbits and leave it out is not credible especially since he staged too many bullets for his tale to be true. That actually supports him staging the scene after the murders which he could only do if he was there.
They dismiss Julie as a liar though he called her before police, used her to sell drugs for him and took her with him to break into the caravan site thus demonstrating he did trust her with his dirty deeds. They also ignore the level of detail of her story which is beyond what someone making things up would go into and someone making it up would not name a hitman but rather say he confessed to personally killing everyone.
Supporters do have the most basic of reasoning. Like you say they suggest Sheila was crazy and crazy people will do things that make no sense at all so we should just believe she did it end of story. Jeremy banked on everyone being such simpletons. Luckily not everyone is so foolish and gullible or he would have gotten away with it.
at there is no reaosn for the gun to have been without the scope the only reaosn to remove it is
