’Former cop aims to help free Jeremy Bamber’ - 17th Feb 2021
Excerpts:
“Former policeman Stuart Bower, from Hove, has been writing to the convicted killer since 2007 and believes Bamber has evidence which may exonerate him.
“Mr Bower said: “There was a documentary and one of the sergeants who attended the scene and was joined there by Jeremy Bamber said they saw somebody moving in the upstairs windows – they withdrew back and hid behind a hedge waiting for the firearms unit to arrive.
“This sergeant said that it was an optical illusion caused by moonshine on the window – which is what caused me to write to the science museum, directed to the Royal Observatory Edinburgh, who confirmed the moon wasn’t shining that night.
“To be exact, it was in its last quarter which means it was nothing more than a silver sickle in the sky.”
https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/19097573.amp/?__twitter_impression=true
He say's he wrote to science museum? Yeah, of course he did.
I'm a hobbyist photographer, and I use an app that tells me the phases of the moon and positions of the sun and so on...
So I went back to 7 Aug 1985 to see what the moon was doing that morning, and the moon was in a phase called 'Waning Gibbous'. And on that particular morning at about 4:00am the moon was about 60 percent visible, and was clearly visible in the night sky.
The story about the 'movement' is that it's always described as a 'trick of the light', rather than it being the actual reflection of the moon.
There was enough moonlight that night to light up the ground and to cast shadows, as well as light up trees, branches, leaves, and all of the outhouses. so it's perfectly believable that moonlight was reflecting off of objects and onto the reflective windows.
And of course, Jeremy agreed with the 'trick of the light' assessment, because as far as I'm aware, he never contested this point at the time.
Why are Bamber supporters constantly lying, and making up facts? What is motivating these people to create lies in order to defend Bamber?
If he was innocent they would only have to repeat the facts.