hello

[Guiltyascharged]

Hello, i was reading the blue forum and then found this. I think luke mitchel is guilty hence my username. Thought id register after reading for a few days.

[Holly Goodhead]

Hi and welcome to the forum Guiltyascharged.

I don't know much about the case, so interested to read your views.  What makes you believe Luke is 'Guilty as charged'?

[LawLass61]

Hey, this is really my first post and I have not yet seen the blue forum. If there is a link to it I would love to see it?

Also have you watched any of the James English Interviews on youtube with Lukes mum or Sandra Lean the criminologist who is heavily involved in the case?
 

[Myster]

Hey, this is really my first post and I have not yet seen the blue forum. If there is a link to it I would love to see it?

Also have you watched any of the James English Interviews on youtube with Lukes mum or Sandra Lean the criminologist who is heavily involved in the case?
 

Hello LawLess,

Yes, a few have commented on the James English table talks with Sandra Lean and Corinne Mitchell, not very favourably I might add, although he'll be extremely lucky if his proposed prison interview with Luke Mitchell ever gets off the ground.  Acceptable with American serial killers maybe, but not in bonny Scotland.

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/jodi-jones-killer-luke-mitchell-16483651

The third part of the trilogy was with polygrapher, Terry Mullins, who appears to think that every person who passes a lie detector test is innocent, including Jeremy Bamber.  Pity Mullins ignores all the other actual evidence stacked up against him.

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16881798.luke-mitchell-interview-terry-mullins-polygraph-expert/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItQvr1lei_k

I wouldn't bother with Tesko's cranky conspiracy forum.  It died a death years ago, and is only useful for documentation on the Bamber case, much of which can be found here.  Should you wish to get bogged down in the slough of despond...

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?PHPSESSID=ts4kf4e56ugh0890d5h2ibfd20&

[LawLass61]

Thanks for the reply and sorry for taking so long to get back. Still trying to navigate my way round this lol.

I just feel James was not prepared at all, there was no really deep knowledge about the case and a lot of questions were not asked and quite embarrassing in my opinion.

I will be very surprised if this interview with Luke does proceed and in the event it does I do hope he is far more prepared than he was in the first 2 interviews.

I will have a watch at the Mullins interview now, this is something I have not seen. I have however got a copy of Sandras first book. Whats the general consensus on this? I imagine it will be more of a bias viewpoint of the justice system rather than a comprehensive critical analysis but i suppose I will soon find out.