Why didn’t the defence mention the alleged conversation inside WHF?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Essentially, Jeremy Bamber is a pathological liar; sly; devious; corrupt; and finds the most ridiculous snippets to try and blow it out of proportion in an attempt to make people think he’s innocent.

All he proves is that he has no remorse and lies just as much as he did 35 years ago.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Essentially, Jeremy Bamber is a pathological liar; sly; devious; corrupt; and finds the most ridiculous snippets to try and blow it out of proportion in an attempt to make people think he’s innocent.

All he proves is that he has no remorse and lies just as much as he did 35 years ago.

He’s actually pathetic, and the few oddballs who believe him are as thick as he is.

Essentially, Jeremy Bamber is a pathological liar; sly; devious; corrupt; and finds the most ridiculous snippets to try and blow it out of proportion in an attempt to make people think he’s innocent.

All he proves is that he has no remorse and lies just as much as he did 35 years ago.

He’s actually pathetic.

The post looks better with the name calling removed it adds nothing to the argument.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Essentially, Jeremy Bamber is a pathological liar; sly; devious; corrupt; and finds the most ridiculous snippets to try and blow it out of proportion in an attempt to make people think he’s innocent.

All he proves is that he has no remorse and lies just as much as he did 35 years ago.

He’s actually pathetic.

The post looks better with the name calling removed it adds nothing to the argument.

Perhaps it does, but I cant be the only one who finds his supporters strange/stupid/naive or plain thick

No-one of average intelligence could take JB seriously — he’s a proven liar, proven thief, and proven murderer

You have to be odd to believe a word he says

[Miss Taken Identity]

Perhaps it does, but I cant be the only one who finds his supporters strange/stupid/naive or plain thick

No-one of average intelligence could take JB seriously — he’s a proven liar, proven thief, and proven murderer

You have to be odd to believe a word he says

You may not be the only one, what it adds to the thread to the debate is zero, which shows up the name calling person as being more thick/stupid- not smart at all.  So it really is pointless if trying to show you are smarter- it back fires.

[Caroline]

Perhaps it does, but I cant be the only one who finds his supporters strange/stupid/naive or plain thick

No-one of average intelligence could take JB seriously — he’s a proven liar, proven thief, and proven murderer

You have to be odd to believe a word he says

I don't mind someone supporting him, if they genuinely believe he's innocent. I do have time for Holly for instance, but he certainly attracts some odd balls.

[mrswah]

Perhaps it does, but I cant be the only one who finds his supporters strange/stupid/naive or plain thick

No-one of average intelligence could take JB seriously — he’s a proven liar, proven thief, and proven murderer

You have to be odd to believe a word he says

No, one does not have to be  odd to question JB's conviction, or even to believe in his innocence.

To debate properly, we have to be tolerant of other people's views, even when we don't agree with them. 

[Caroline]

No, one does not have to be  odd to question JB's conviction, or even to believe in his innocence.

To debate properly, we have to be tolerant of other people's views, even when we don't agree with them.

You don't have to be odd, but he does attract some very odd characters.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

You may not be the only one, what it adds to the thread to the debate is zero, which shows up the name calling person as being more thick/stupid- not smart at all.  So it really is pointless if trying to show you are smarter- it back fires.

When the weird Lord Longford used to support Myra Hyndley everyone, including MO’s and the press, openly said how odd and gullible he was.

It’s an opinion.

And they were right.