So was the blessed thing open in the first place,you pays your money and takes a choice.
The physics model where the witness described exactly what happened as a result of weather conditions outside and air pressure within the apartment as described by the witness certainly works.
In my opinion and in the opinion of investigators not closely associated with Amaral the crime scene was as initially described.
Sceptics appear to have absolutely no problem with air currents and tentatively suggested pooling odours within the apartment.
The wonder must surely be their combined disbelief, despite inability to refute the science of conditions which resulted in 'whooshing' curtains and slamming doors as described by the only witness whose continued action of leaning out of the window is confirmed by the position of her fingertip print on the glass.
What choice did you pays your money for and how did you justify your opinion to yourself?