« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7   Go Down

Author Topic: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”  (Read 10282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2018, 09:45:42 PM »
Quote from: Brietta on July 03, 2018, 09:31:41 PM
I am saying that you have started a thread for which you are incapable of providing a cite.  Which by my reckoning makes it your opinion and nothing at all to do with the facts this forum expects and demands.

I’m not sure why you think I haven’t provided a cite. It is obvious that at least from the beginning of August the McCanns were being investigated so when the statement quoted was made OS knew that.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #16 on: July 03, 2018, 09:47:25 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on July 03, 2018, 09:45:42 PM
I’m not sure why you think I haven’t provided a cite. It is obvious that at least from the beginning of August that the McCanns were being investigated so when the statement quoted was made OS knew that.

its also obvious the investigation had problems distinguishing their A from their E
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #17 on: July 03, 2018, 09:49:27 PM »
Quote from: Davel on July 03, 2018, 09:47:25 PM
its also obvious the investigation had problems distinguishing their A from their E

Im not discussing the competence of the investigation but whether at one point the McCanns were being investigated but the official spokesperson denied they were suspects.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #18 on: July 03, 2018, 09:59:31 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on July 03, 2018, 09:30:15 PM
That is a major victory then IMO.


Or not as the case maybe.
"This week the couple, from Rothley, Leics, withdrew their defamation action after being advised that the newspaper had a strong defence under Portuguese law.

It could argue the story was published in good faith because senior police officers did at the time believe the McCanns may have been implicated in the case."


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/6057918/McCanns-drop-libel-case-against-Portuguese-newspaper.html


« Last Edit: July 03, 2018, 11:32:42 PM by John »
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline faithlilly

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #19 on: July 03, 2018, 10:02:16 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on July 03, 2018, 09:59:31 PM

Or not as the case maybe.
"This week the couple, from Rothley, Leics, withdrew their defamation action after being advised that the newspaper had a strong defence under Portuguese law.

It could argue the story was published in good faith because senior police officers did at the time believe the McCanns may have been implicated in the case."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/6057918/McCanns-drop-libel-case-against-Portuguese-newspaper.html

Yes, it was true.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2018, 11:33:51 PM by John »
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #20 on: July 03, 2018, 10:18:01 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on July 03, 2018, 10:02:16 PM
Yes, it was true.
Have you read the, article you have quoted..
The claim was dropped for a number of reasons... Firstly the paper went bust
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #21 on: July 03, 2018, 10:21:34 PM »
Quote from: Davel on July 03, 2018, 10:18:01 PM
Have you read the, article you have quoted..
The claim was dropped for a number of reasons... Firstly the paper went bust

But the McCanns were under suspicion.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #22 on: July 03, 2018, 10:29:15 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on July 03, 2018, 10:21:34 PM
But the McCanns were under suspicion.
I'm not allowed to answer
Logged

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #23 on: July 03, 2018, 10:31:10 PM »
Quote from: Davel on July 03, 2018, 10:18:01 PM
Have you read the, article you have quoted..
The claim was dropped for a number of reasons... Firstly the paper went bust

They could have pursued the author.
What they did according to the article was:
 "A source close to the couple confirmed that the defamation action against the newspaper and two journalists had been dropped.

The source said the McCanns want to concentrate instead on their £1 million case against Goncalo Amaral, the former head of the Madeleine investigation".

Well that didn't pan out too well did it?
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline faithlilly

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #24 on: July 03, 2018, 10:33:15 PM »
Quote from: Davel on July 03, 2018, 10:29:15 PM
I'm not allowed to answer

Not sure what you’d say. It is true.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #25 on: July 03, 2018, 10:39:52 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on July 03, 2018, 10:33:15 PM
Not sure what you’d say. It is true.
If the McCanns are truly the only suspects in this case, why hasn’t the case been shelved again due to lack of evidence?
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Robittybob1

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #26 on: July 03, 2018, 10:42:03 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on July 03, 2018, 09:59:31 PM

Or not as the case maybe.
"This week the couple, from Rothley, Leics, withdrew their defamation action after being advised that the newspaper had a strong defence under Portuguese law".

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/6057918/McCanns-drop-libel-case-against-Portuguese-newspaper.html
That article is 2 years later.  The paper has still gone bust and they are looking to sue Amaral at that stage.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #27 on: July 03, 2018, 10:47:48 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on July 03, 2018, 10:21:34 PM
But the McCanns were under suspicion.
One part of the PJ informing the paper that the McCanns were under suspicion ( the reason for the strong defence) and the Inspector Olegario de Sousa making a claim the McCanns were not suspects.  Two answers to the one issue.  One must be an error.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #28 on: July 03, 2018, 11:03:01 PM »
Quote from: Brietta on July 03, 2018, 09:31:41 PM
I am saying that you have started a thread for which you are incapable of providing a cite.  Which by my reckoning makes it your opinion and nothing at all to do with the facts this forum expects and demands.

Are you seriously trying to claim they were not suspects in August 2007 and Sousa didn't know about it?

Why do you think they took their hire car away in August and returned it missing a part?

Why did they take their clothes away to examine?

Why do you think they were told, 'Next time we meet it will be across the table'?
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline faithlilly

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #29 on: July 03, 2018, 11:07:44 PM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on July 03, 2018, 11:03:01 PM
Are you seriously trying to claim they were not suspects in August 2007 and Sousa didn't know about it?

Why do you think they took their hire car away in August and returned it missing a part?

Why did they take their clothes away to examine?

Why do you think they were told, 'Next time we meet it will be across the table'?

Her posts puzzled me too.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7   Go Up
« previous next »