Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.

[Miss Taken Identity]

No we don’t, the Met have already established it.

What did the met establish?  the abduction time?   

[Venturi Swirl]

What did the met establish?  the abduction time?   

a window of opportunity for an abductor to strike.

[Robittybob1]

At the very least it would have been interesting to see Jez Wilkins trying to decide whether to go into the Tapas Restaurant, the Tapas Bar or the toilet. I don't know where the toilet was, and Jez wasn't very clear. It was either in the var, near the bar or in the pool area.
 https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY_BRIGET.htm
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY-WILKINS-ROGATORY.htm
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY-WILKINS.htm

In my opinion he went into the restaurant between 8:30 and 9:00 because that's what he told the PJ on 4th May when events were fresh in his mind.

Even if they couldn't get all the Tapas 9 to turn up maybe they could have done a reconstruction of Jez' walk to establish the time he interacted with Gerry on the street.

[Robittybob1]

Even if they couldn't get all the Tapas 9 to turn up maybe they could have done a reconstruction of Jez' walk to establish the time he interacted with Gerry on the street.

Would it be possible to do the reconstruction one person at a time?

[Venturi Swirl]

Well the MET must therefore be withholding information from Do Carmo because he states the PJ don’t know what happened to the child, suggesting they have established absolutely nothing.

Illogical.  The Met didn’t say they had established beyond any doubt that Madeleine had been abducted only that they had established a window of opportunity for an abductor to commit the deed.

[G-Unit]

No we don’t, the Met have already established it.

The Met may have a theory, but it's not been proved to be correct as far as I know.

[Venturi Swirl]

So where is the logic in giving the MET a remit to only to investigate an abduction in that case?

Because based on all the known facts abduction is the only logical, plausible theory. 

[Venturi Swirl]

The Met may have a theory, but it's not been proved to be correct as far as I know.

Did I say it had been?  There’s really no need to state the obvious.

[G-Unit]

Illogical.  The Met didn’t say they had established beyond any doubt that Madeleine had been abducted only that they had established a window of opportunity for an abductor to commit the deed.

Based on an unverified timeline. Even the 'bumbling PJ' had more sense than to do that.

[Venturi Swirl]

Based on an unverified timeline. Even the 'bumbling PJ' had more sense than to do that.

How do you verify the timeline, pray tell?

[Venturi Swirl]

Based on the known facts it’s a theory that has turned out to be utter tosh in terms of results.

That statement is utter tosh.  A theory is not “utter tosh” because it has not been proven.  By your definition McCann involvement in hiding their daughter’s body is “utter tosh” too, do you agree?

[The General]

How do you verify the timeline, pray tell?

Place them all under caution, then ask the questions again.

[G-Unit]

Hi little lady, I am in a beautiful Benbecula right now, but to my disappointment the Westford Inn is closed on a Monday so I’ll raise a glass in the Borrosdale Hotel for you tonight.

Cheers. It's the remotest place I've ever lived, with extreme weather in winter, but it won my heart. It's the only place I cried to be leaving when I caught the plane to Glasgow for the last time.

[Eleanor]

You could hire Kevin Halligen if he were still alive and use his spy satellite images, would be one method.

There were no Spy Satellite Images.

[Venturi Swirl]

Absolutely not, the dog alerted to the possibility of Madeleine’s cadaver, they didn’t alert to abductors.

so the theory of parental involvement has been proven by the dogs has it?  What utter tosh!