Is the maddie fund.... now a secret fund

[Robittybob1]

So are you saying Brietta's post was requesting evidence and myself by replying was agreeing to give evidence. If so please see these links

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2010.htm

And Adam Tudor of Carter Ruck

Mr Tudor: Yes. My partners and I talked about it. We have a committee of partners that looks at whether or not a case is on a no win, no fee basis, as you probably heard from my partner, Mark Thompson. We did that with Kate and Gerry's case. It was a longer, more difficult discussion than would ordinarily be the case because of the extraordinary nature, volume and so on. We sent the complaints to The Express and The Star, at which point we were acting on a normal retainer. We indicated to Kate and Gerry and we told The Express and The Star at that time that if the matter was not resolved we would indeed go on to a no win, no fee arrangement.



https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmcumeds/uc275-iii/uc27502.htm

There is the evidence. I hope this answers your post.

So what does that prove?  It doesn't actually show me the money came from the fund.  If it does correct me please?

[Brietta]

Allow me to reiterate ...

What is the evidence that Madeleine's Fund financed any litigation?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9775.msg478478#msg478478

[faithlilly]

Allow me to reiterate ...

What is the evidence that Madeleine's Fund financed any litigation?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9775.msg478478#msg478478

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2010.htm

Director’s report.

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2013.htm

Director’s report.

[Brietta]

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2010.htm

Director’s report.

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2013.htm

Director’s report.

Really???  Surely that information can't possibly exist.  I've been told Madeleine's Fund was opaque with no-one being able to access information or penetrate its secrecy.
What a super sleuth you must be to have penetrated the veil 

[Robittybob1]

Really???  Surely that information can't possibly exist.  I've been told Madeleine's Fund was opaque with no-one being able to access information or penetrate its secrecy.
What a super sleuth you must be to have penetrated the veil 

On what line is the evidence?

[Sunny]

On what line is the evidence?

Robittybob1 please look at page 7 of the fund 2017 accounts under creditors: amounts falling due within one year. There is a mention of an outstanding debt with Isabel Duarte

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2017.htm

I hope this is evidence that the fund was used for litigation

creditor
ˈkrɛdɪtə/Submit
noun
a person or company to whom money is owing.
"he sold his Ferraris to pay off his creditors"

[Robittybob1]

Robittybob1 please look at page 7 of the fund 2017 accounts under creditors: amounts falling due within one year. There is a mention of an outstanding debt with Isabel Duarte

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2017.htm

I hope this is evidence that the fund was used for litigation

creditor
ˈkrɛdɪtə/Submit
noun
a person or company to whom money is owing.
"he sold his Ferraris to pay off his creditors"

Personally I don't have a problem with that. 

[kizzy]

Has Madeleine been found, as that was/is the purpose of the Fund?

As you know maddie hasn't been found -  seems OYO that was the purpose of the fund IMO.

Its what my mother and sister also thought - much now to there regret for ever contributing to that fund

[Brietta]

Robittybob1 please look at page 7 of the fund 2017 accounts under creditors: amounts falling due within one year. There is a mention of an outstanding debt with Isabel Duarte

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2017.htm

I hope this is evidence that the fund was used for litigation

creditor
ˈkrɛdɪtə/Submit
noun
a person or company to whom money is owing.
"he sold his Ferraris to pay off his creditors"

You are wrong on one point ... it wasn't a Ferrari ... it was a Jaguar.
Snip
Consequently, following the McCann family's claim for compensation, he decided through a precautionary procedure to arrest Amaral's share of the company, a third of his salary as a manager, and even the Jaguar that the former police officer leads - but that belongs to to the firm.

The car, with a displacement of 2700cc and a price of around 70,000 euros, was bought in May and registered on behalf of Gonçalo Amaral Unipessoal Lda., With a share capital of 5000 euros. The company, established in November last year, offers consultancy, studies and analysis in the area of ​​criminal investigation and specializes in the dissemination, promotion and communication of technical works.
https://expresso.sapo.pt/arquivo/tribunal-fica-com-jaguar-de-goncalo-amaral=f544234#gs.uM3Es30


But it seems that the question asked in the tread title has been well and truly answered by the volume of information being released by members ... all of which uses various years for various cites emanating from publications released in the public domain and all concerning the audited Madeleine's Fund.

Categorically proof has been provided that Madeleine's Fund is anything but "secret" ... all legitimate and above board as no doubt expected by Companies House.  Glad that's one issue solved.

[faithlilly]

Really???  Surely that information can't possibly exist.  I've been told Madeleine's Fund was opaque with no-one being able to access information or penetrate its secrecy.
What a super sleuth you must be to have penetrated the veil 

Stop deflecting Brietta. You asked for evidence for the fund money being used for litigation. I gave you it. Now a thank you wouldn’t go amiss.

As to the fund being transparent, do we know how much has been used on the ill-fated litigation?

[Brietta]

Stop deflecting Brietta. You asked for evidence for the fund money being used for litigation. I gave you it. Now a thank you wouldn’t go amiss.

As to the fund being transparent, do we know how much has been used on the ill-fated litigation?

Thank you for providing the information I requested.  But don't you think it rather odd the source of your information is from Madeleine's Fund.

Make up your mind time, Faithlilly, either Madeleine's Fund is transparent or it is not ... and if it is not transparent, how is it you and others are able to access it from the public domain and quote from it?


By the way ... no deflection from me as you well know ... but you've got a bit of a conundrum going there for you.

[faithlilly]

Thank you for providing the information I requested.  But don't you think it rather odd the source of your information is from Madeleine's Fund.

Make up your mind time, Faithlilly, either Madeleine's Fund is transparent or it is not ... and if it is not transparent, how is it you and others are able to access it from the public domain and quote from it?


By the way ... no deflection from me as you well know ... but you've got a bit of a conundrum going there for you.

No conundrum. When the fund was launched we were told that the fund would be fully transparent. Do we know the exact sum spent on litigation?

[misty]

As you know maddie hasn't been found -  seems OYO that was the purpose of the fund IMO.

Its what my mother and sister also thought - much now to there regret for ever contributing to that fund

When the Fund was launched, the McCanns were not being accused of committing crimes by every Tom, Dick & Harry & Madeleine had not been written off as dead by the investigating police force. Needs changed.

IMO.

[Angelo222]

Really???  Surely that information can't possibly exist.  I've been told Madeleine's Fund was opaque with no-one being able to access information or penetrate its secrecy.
What a super sleuth you must be to have penetrated the veil 

What is recorded is an absolute bare minimum and makes a mockery of the original promise of transparency.

[Robittybob1]

There is no end to detail.