Lookout from the Jeremy Bamber forum.

[Holly Goodhead]

According to NGB the publisher of a forum carries overall responsibility ie Mike:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8796.msg419836.html#msg419836

[Angelo222]

According to NGB the publisher of a forum carries overall responsibility ie Mike:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8796.msg419836.html#msg419836

That's not the case, members are solely responsible for the material they post.

[Holly Goodhead]

That's not the case, members are solely responsible for the material they post.

A few Google searches seem to suggest first and foremost "authors" are responsible ie individual members but moderators known legally as "secondary publishers" can also be held responsible. This apparently falls under defamation law: libel (written word) and slander (spoken word). 

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/21/uk_defamation_law_reforms_take_effect_from_start_of_2014/

[Holly Goodhead]

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/section/5/enacted

[Holly Goodhead]

Maybe KNGB would like to pop over to discuss the matter.  Stranger things have happened eg a proposed meet between Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump.  Both of whom have dodgy hairstyles.  Ooops have I defamed anyone 

Must remember to look out the nerve agent detection kit.

[Angelo222]

In the first instance a complaint must be made to the site owner giving them the opportunity to remove the material. What you previously stated about NGB is true though, he does his own credibility no favours by allowing libellous comments to be posted on the Jeremy Bamber forum.

[ActualMat]

A few Google searches seem to suggest first and foremost "authors" are responsible ie individual members but moderators known legally as "secondary publishers" can also be held responsible. This apparently falls under defamation law: libel (written word) and slander (spoken word). 

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/21/uk_defamation_law_reforms_take_effect_from_start_of_2014/

It'd be a waste of time for anyone to try and go after NGB or ModMaggie  for Lookouts posts, it's murky at best to try and tie them into anything Lookouts posted - although Lookout herself has posted far more than enough to be in hot water. I know she's been been reported before, once ages ago but also very recently, he age stops it being in the public interest to pursure. Sadly.

[sika]

Who really gives a f..k? 

[Holly Goodhead]

Who really gives a f..k?

Noone with a life.

What really bugs me is the likes of NGB, Maggie, Lookout and Gladys bleating about others when they do exactly the same either directly or indirectly by effectively condoning the posts of others.

At least Mike doesn't get all big girls blousy. 

[Holly Goodhead]

Lookout has recovered from her meltdown complete with 37,953 posts:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8796.msg435305.html#msg435305

Welcome back...

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9319.msg436597.html#msg436597

[Holly Goodhead]

Lookout thanks for sharing your pearls of wisdom but what you need to bear in mind, assuming you want to assist JB, is whether they are capable of forming appeal points?  I would suggest not.  "Trajectories" I would suggest could. 

[puglove]

Nelly. Moderate your forum. It is now beyond disgraceful.


 

[puglove]

Nelly. Moderate your forum. It is now beyond disgraceful.


 

And as if by magic..........


 

[Holly Goodhead]

A pity those on Blue who were quick to judge and voice opinions over Stephanie's threads/posts remain silent over Mike's.

Stephanie by and large was posting about JB and personality disorders.  Not a view I share.  However not outlandish given professionals have said as much on docu/dramas.  During the last 24 hours Mike has claimed Prince Philip fathered JB and NB fathered the twins and yet not a word from the regulars.  That's what I call breathtaking hypocrisy. 

[puglove]

A pity those on Blue who were quick to judge and voice opinions over Stephanie's threads/posts remain silent over Mike's.

Stephanie by and large was posting about JB and personality disorders.  Not a view I share.  However not outlandish given professionals have said as much on docu/dramas.  During the last 24 hours Mike has claimed Prince Philip fathered JB and NB fathered the twins and yet not a word from the regulars.  That's what I call breathtaking hypocrisy.

Even by Tesko's "standards" it was horrible - less "clever b........", more dodgy little pervert.

I don't understand why anyone continues to support him, unless they share his views.